I haven't yet heard of any action by the Trump Administration targeting architectural firms as they have universities and law firms for their direct or perceived violations of the Trump Agenda.
However, the Department of Public Design recently received a letter from the Administration which astonished me given we are a small design firm that does not participate in federal projects nor received federal funds for any of the public exhibition work we've done. While it was later determined to have been sent in error just like the recent letter to Harvard University, I thought I would share the general gist of it in case your firm participates in federally funded projects or plans to apply for federal grants or funding of any sort.
Design Guidelines: The letter indicated that all federal projects would be required to meet the design aesthetic of President Trump and any design considered other than traditional classic architecture would be considered. The President appointed himself the Chairman of the Review Committee that would be evaluating the RFP's and subsequent submissions. While the criteria for evaluating proposals has not been released to the profession, one person with inside information that requested anonymity indicated that past participation in and financial support for President Trump's favorite causes would be viewed favorably. Past support which the Committee would uncover in their review of proposals for any "Democrat" causes and/or organizations would be considered disqualifying.
DEI Initiatives: All initiatives, programs, funding and support for diversity, equity and inclusion that the firm has developed and instituted is to cease immediately. All employees and partners will be required to fill out a form to be provided by the administration in the near future indicating steps to be taken to remove these discriminatory practices. In order to prevent obvious fraud, digital submissions will not be accepted . Information on completing the new analog form will be announced soon by the DHS via the Signal App.
In addition, all references to anything having to do with the firm's current and past DEI efforts shall be scrubbed from all websites, marketing material, project descriptions, social media and any other communication strategies heretofore employed by the firm.
Viewpoint Diversity in Hiring and Advancement: The firm is required to hire an external entity approved by the federal government to review staffing at all levels and to evaluate how firm advancement and partnerships have been awarded. This will insure that there is a diversity of viewpoints among staff and leadership regarding firm strategies, business practices, hiring advancement, project design and all other components of our architectural practice. The external entity will be responsible for reporting results and assuring that both competent and incompetent/inexperienced applicants are employed and assigned responsibilities they may or may not be qualified to undertake.
Sustainability and Climate Change: Since the President and his administration believe that climate change is a hoax perpetrated upon the American people by not Trump people, all references to a firm's commitment to sustainability, fighting climate change and building resiliency shall also be scrubbed from their current media output and no mention of this heresy shall be part of future responses to any federally funded project RFP's. All firms that employ more than 500 employees shall be required to have 50% of their corporate board positions filled with applicants approved by the President or by his department functionaries.
Pro Bono Requirements: All firms responding to federally funded projects shall include in their proposals their commitment to 2025 hours of pro bono work supporting organizations and causes that President Trump approves of. No current or future pro bono work provided by the firm shall be directed toward any cause or organization not supported by the President, and all current pro bono efforts directed toward organizations that are antithetical to the Trump Agenda shall cease immediately if you are currently receiving federal funds for ongoing work. Firms will be required to report quarterly all details of their pro bono work including staff hours and names that shall include a list of 5 personal reflections to insure that viewpoint diversity exists among those providing pro bono services.
OK, so haha, couldn't happen to us. Maybe it already is, I don't know given my work.
This thread began some weeks ago with a spirited conversation (myself included though I was quite "skeptical" to say the least and was "corrected" by a subsequent member post) about what many agreed was the laudable effort to ferret out waste and fraud in a ballooned federal bureaucracy. However, we have seen in the last several weeks that this effort is a smokescreen for the far more sinister goals of this authoritarian president. Is this what to expect when the current administration turns its sights on the architectural profession after it's finished attacking the legal community, the judicial system, educational institutions, historic alliances and other instruments of our democracy currently under siege?
Finally, I refer you to two articles from the recent May 25 Atlantic Magazine:
A Warning out of Time; How autocrats create spheres of lawlessness by Aziz Huq and
Everything We Once Believed In by David Brooks
Our profession and country are not immune from this emerging darkness.
Jay H. Isenberg, AIA
Isenberg + Associates | IsenbergADR | Peyser LLC
8640 Winsdale Street N.
Minneapolis, MN 55427
612-799-3217
Original Message:
Sent: 4/18/2025 6:49:00 PM
From: William S. Adelson AIA Member Emeritus
Subject: RE: When Budgets Go Dark, Public Spaces Suffer: Architects Must Speak Up
Ok, Sean, I see this was written about 6 weeks ago. I assume you feel the same way in mid-April 2025. (?) The stock market and all...... Hey, he is moving fast and breaking things. That's the idea right. "All of the Presidential endeavors we are now witnessing were described during the man's Presidential campaign, further demonstrating that his functionaries are doing the will of the people." I just don't remember the DOGE thing during the campaign. I don't remember him saying that "if you have a government job, you better be getting your resume out." I guess I remember tariffs because he thinks they are "beautiful." Not sure he said we should prepare for a recession (or depression, or stagflation), which are all good things for architects (insert sarcasm here). How's that deportation of 11 million undocumented people doing? Maybe sending 250 to El Salvador and filming the event as if it's on Netflix is better for his image.
We need to retire our National Debt. I agree. Should he take that money from Social Security and Medicaid to do it ?
Demolition contractors Move Fast and Break Things; architects evaluate, plan, design, detail, execute, and verify. I think of myself as an architect.
------------------------------
William Adelson AIA Member Emeritus
William Adelson
Ramona CA
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 02-25-2025 10:04 PM
From: Sean Catherall AIA
Subject: When Budgets Go Dark, Public Spaces Suffer: Architects Must Speak Up
Jay, I think it's necessary to correct a couple of statements: "attack by this unregulated renegade group led by an unharnessed rogue." The "rogue" you're referring to happens to have been constitutionally elected by a significant majority to be the Commander-in-Chief of our military and the Chief Executive of our nation. There are constitutional checks and balances in place, including term limits, judicial oversight, and congressional action, such as budgetary restrictions and impeachment. These checks and balances "harness" the man, obligating him to do the will of the people or face ouster, reversal, or powerlessness. Since he "regulates" his own branch of the government (just as all former Chief Executives did), the functionaries of those branches are also obligated to do the will of the people or be removed. All of the Presidential endeavors we are now witnessing were described during the man's Presidential campaign, further demonstrating that his functionaries are doing the will of the people. "Outrage" and "concern" are too little, too late, and without sufficient popular support to accomplish anything. Since the Left has lost its information hegemony, it will likewise lose this battle and the nation will be better off for it.
------------------------------
Sean Catherall AIA
Murray UT
------------------------------