Thanks for the clarification, Dennis. I'm in California, so we are required to follow CBC chapters 11A or 11B (depending on the type of project) and we have to notify our clients that sometimes it can conflict with the ADA and there is potential risk in the future of a lawsuit. The rest of the country on a version of the IBC, will need to follow the ANSI A117.1 standard. We always explain this to our clients that ADA is not a building code, it's a civil rights law and we do not design buildings to abide to civil rights (don't get me wrong, I am all for civil rights and the ADA). This is why this is such a grey area. I think we need to push federal legislation that indemnifies architects, engineers, builders, or similar trades that are licensed to protect the health, safety and welfare of the occupants from ADA lawsuits. The owner of a facility should be the one liable for making sure that they are providing equivalent access as indicated by the ADA. Don't know if the AIA has been active in this area in the past. Anyone else please chime in. Maybe we need to start an open letter on this topic.
Original Message:
Sent: 07-18-2024 10:13 AM
From: Dennis J. Hall FAIA
Subject: ADA Certification Letter request by lender
Daniel, while the organizational structure of ADAAG and the A117.1 Standard (Standard) are the same, the contents are not exactly alike. In the 2017 edition of the Standard, there were significant updates to the 2009 edition and in the current revision cycle, anticipated for balloting later this year or early 2025, there were more than 250 proposed changes.
The A117 Committee has spent several years working on the new edition and is not bound by the ADA. Many revisions reflect new knowledge in accessibility, based on testing and scientific research. I have seen architectural drawings that cite ADAAG as the Code and even include multiple sheets of Drawings directly from ADAAG, but this is problematic as the IBC is based on the Standard, not ADAG.
Hope this is helpful.
------------------------------
Dennis Hall FAIA, FCSI
HALL AEC PA
Charlotte NC
Original Message:
Sent: 07-17-2024 06:29 PM
From: Daniel Guich
Subject: ADA Certification Letter request by lender
I agree with Dennis. I think in terms of meeting the accessibility requirements in the building code, we could make a statement that the drawings were prepared by including the requirements in the chapter 11 or ANSI A117.1. The ADA is a civil rights law and not building code (even though the ANSI A117.1 is exactly the ADAAG 2010) Such a grey area.
------------------------------
Daniel Guich, NCARB, CDT, LEED ap
Original Message:
Sent: 07-17-2024 05:48 PM
From: Dennis J. Hall FAIA
Subject: ADA Certification Letter request by lender
Since the ADA is civil rights legislation and determination of compliance rests with the DOJ and the courts. In my opinion, certifying legal compliance is beyond the licensure of architects. As architects, we are certainly qualified to opine on architectural questions, but I would deter all legal questions to the Client's attorney. Now, if the Client ask you for an opinion regarding Chapter 11 of the IBC and compliance with ICC A117.1 regarding accessibility, as an architect you may be qualified to opine on compliance, based on professional education, training, and experience, and of course " to the the best of your knowledge information and belief."
The Lender can always engage an accessibility consultant who may feel qualified to render such an opinion, but the ADA and the Building Code requirements are different sets of requirements. Don't get suckered in to practicing beyond the normal standard of care of architects or your license.
------------------------------
Dennis Hall FAIA, FCSI
HALL AEC PA
Charlotte NC
Original Message:
Sent: 07-16-2024 12:51 PM
From: Nea Poole
Subject: ADA Certification Letter request by lender
My attorney says never "certify". A suggestion would be to start your sentence with "To the best of my knowledge, and as required...."
------------------------------
Nea May Poole, AIA, NCARB
Principal
Poole & Poole Architecture, LLC
Glen Allen, Virginia
Original Message:
Sent: 05-14-2024 05:39 PM
From: Robert Lee Smith III AIA
Subject: ADA Certification Letter request by lender
My boss and mentor always said to avoid certifying anything as broad and all encompassing as the "project meets building code" or "project meets ADA requirements". This is really beyond the capability of any mortal man or woman. Sometimes these requirements even have conflicts within themselves or even more exciting, the actual requirements can be open to multiple interpretations. When necessary, I have made statements that include some qualifying language. Something like:
"I certify that to the best of my knowledge and as required by the legally required standard of care this project has been developed and completed in accordance with the applicable (insert whatever standard), but due to the complexity of the (standard) I cannot attest that it fully complies in all instances."
I am sure there is better wording that this, but I create the statement to specifically suit the situation. This covers the general idea.
------------------------------
Robert Smith AIA
Talley & Smith Architecture, Inc.
Shelby NC
Original Message:
Sent: 05-13-2024 01:03 PM
From: Deborah M. Smithton AIA
Subject: ADA Certification Letter request by lender
We have been requested by the Lender for an Affordable Housing project to provide a letter certifying the project meets ADA requirements. Does the AIA have any language related to this?
------------------------------
Deborah Smithton AIA
Smithton Architects, Inc
San Diego CA
------------------------------