Practice Management Member Conversations

 View Only
Expand all | Collapse all

Design Build Documents Content

  • 1.  Design Build Documents Content

    Posted 11-28-2013 10:33 AM
    This message has been cross posted to the following Discussion Forums: Practice Management Member Conversations and Construction Contract Administration .
    -------------------------------------------
    I have a question about any AIA or industry guidelines or references for construction drawings/document content for design-build versus standard or bid-build documents.  What is generally-accepted level of documentation/detailing for design-build drawings compared with level of documentation/detailing for bid-build?  Any AIA (or other industry organizations) memos or guidelines on the subject?

    I have found some references or discussions describing design-build documents as performance documents.... any references or guidelines showing examples of performance drawings or level of detail?

    -------------------------------------------
    John Biggs AIA
    Architect
    LJA Architechts & Engineers
    Williston ND
    -------------------------------------------
    AIA Business Academy: A high-impact, four-part intensive program starting June 9. Earn 22.75 LUs. Click here to learn more.


  • 2.  RE:Design Build Documents Content

    Posted 12-02-2013 12:36 PM
    Good question, John!

    In my almost 40 years of practice, I have found no standard.  Essentially, what I have heard from state licensing boards and local building officials is that the level of detail is up to the professional who certifies the documents.  This is presumably true, regardless of the contracting method for design and/or construction.

    I once saw a relatively comprehensive document list that was sent to  municipalities in Iowa.  It outlined expected minimums before an official should accept a set of documents.  I wish somebody/anybody on the permitting side of the equation used such a list.

    When we work for contractors on design-build projects, they tell us and their client that they will not want to spend money on details because they already are capable of constructing the details.  However, if something is unclear during construction, they ask for more drawings at no cost, claiming that we should have known to provide that information.  We have also been asked to rework anything that the contractor and their client call "VE", although it comes late in the game and may be best characterized as "cost cutting".

    Are the standards the same if the documents are submitted by an architect as opposed to documents submitted by non-architects?  That is a question for another day.

    Robin Miller AIA
    MSH Architects
    Sioux Falls SD




    AIA Business Academy: A high-impact, four-part intensive program starting June 9. Earn 22.75 LUs. Click here to learn more.


  • 3.  RE:Design Build Documents Content

    Posted 12-03-2013 07:06 PM
    I am working on a design + build project right now and the contractor is requesting a high level of detail in the drawings for a number of reasons: 1. They want the permitting process to be as smooth and fast as possible. 2. They want the Owner to know exactly what to expect as a final result--we are reviewing each decision with the owner via the drawings and asking the Owner to sign the documents. 3. They want the subcontracts to have as complete and detailed a set of documents as possible for accurate bidding and thorough coordination. 4. They see the drawings as their vehicle for visualization and decision-making with the entire design and construction team--the more that is worked out in the design process, the smoother things go in the field.

    -------------------------------------------
    Sean Catherall AIA
    Architect
    Herriman UT
    -------------------------------------------



    AIA Business Academy: A high-impact, four-part intensive program starting June 9. Earn 22.75 LUs. Click here to learn more.


  • 4.  RE:Design Build Documents Content

    Posted 12-05-2013 03:31 PM
    Sean,

    You have to be clear whether you are in scenario 1 -working for the client preparing a design-build contract documentation or are you in scenario 2 being part of the design-build team preparing a bid for the design-build contract.

    If you are on the client's team preparing the bid document for the design-build contract, what the contractor is asking for does not make sense, if you had already defined all the performance specification and design parameters.

    If the design document spells out in a detailed manner how the work is to be built, it is de facto a design-bid-build process. Design-build procurement process retain certain design input for the design-build contractor to leverage on their purported expertise in carrying out the specialist work and to take advantage of the time saved in developing detailed design and coordination. If the contractor is asking for information that are not provided due to intended deferred submittal, then that is a separate issue altogether.

    If you are on the design-build team, then it is reasonable for the contractor in your team to ask you to provide detailed design for them to price accurately for the work.

    My understanding of John's message is- he is referring to the design-build documentation in scenario 1 for permit application. Or have I misunderstood?


    -------------------------------------------
    Geok Ser Lee Intl. Assoc. AIA
    Owner
    GSLA
    Irvine CA
    -------------------------------------------






    AIA Business Academy: A high-impact, four-part intensive program starting June 9. Earn 22.75 LUs. Click here to learn more.


  • 5.  RE:Design Build Documents Content

    Posted 12-06-2013 05:47 PM
    Contractually, if an architect is under direct contract with the owner and no builder is part of that contract, and the architect is preparing plans for a negotiated price, an agency CM project or a CM-at-risk project, it's not design build. And there's no contractual reason why a set of design build documents cannot show a high level of detail, particularly when the builder collaborates in determining which details are needed and the content of some of the details--such a set of drawings doesn't change the contractual nature of the project.

    -------------------------------------------
    Sean Catherall AIA
    Architect
    Herriman UT
    -------------------------------------------



    AIA Business Academy: A high-impact, four-part intensive program starting June 9. Earn 22.75 LUs. Click here to learn more.


  • 6.  RE:Design Build Documents Content

    Posted 12-09-2013 07:08 PM
    We have done multiple versions of Design Build and the documents are different.  Code compliance drawings are basic to all of them.

    The version of Design Build where you team with the contractor at the start of the project and work together on the project.  We only work with a select few contractors. We only work with those we know will do the project right. We work directly with the Owner that is a requirement for us to do the work.  There is a base level of documents required to show code compliance.  Beyond that we talk with them about what details they need.  Items being bid by multiple subs are shown in detail so they all bid the same thing.  On the complicated design items we start with sketches and work with the craftsman who are going to build it on the details, they understand the concept and take great pride in the result.

    We have also worked for the VA developing what used to be called Part A where you have to establish the requirements for the design build teams to bid.  The documents have to convey the requirements but leave some room for the bidders to determine how to best meet those requirements.  Sometimes the exterior appearance has to blend with the adjoining buildings so we show more sometimes you provide more freedom to the bidding team.

    We have also done a one what used to be Part B where we are developing the Part A documents created by others. Your drawings need to convey how you are meeting the requirements the Part A documents while also showing the contractor how to build the project.  Again the amount of detail is based on rather that part of the work is bid or negotiated and your level of confidence with the contractor.

    As I have told multiple friends deciding rather to do DB.  Your reputation is going to be in the hands of the contractor so only team with people you know and trust.  

    -------------------------------------------
    Robert Carlson AIA
    Principal
    Carlson Design Team PC
    Iowa City IA
    -------------------------------------------






    AIA Business Academy: A high-impact, four-part intensive program starting June 9. Earn 22.75 LUs. Click here to learn more.


  • 7.  RE:Design Build Documents Content

    Posted 12-09-2013 07:28 PM
    Again, I know we are a bit off the original query... but to those who believe the A/E should prepare different types of documents dependent on the project delivery method, I would pose the following: 

    You have been engaged by an Owner to design a project.  The Owner, let's say a developer, gives you the impression the he will use  'delivery type X' - a negotiated sum using a contractor with whom he has a long history, and who he assures you understands every nut and bolt the developer wants for his project.  You prepare CD's that are 'light' on content, because you believe that is all that is needed in that particular scenario, especially taking into account repeated meetings with the developer, and/or the presumed contractor (who has been looking at your documents during development, preparing estimates, giving the Owner - and perhaps you - feedback on what he needs or does not need, etc.). 

    But there is no contract in place yet between the developer and contractor.  The developer does not intend to sign a contract until he sees what the total cost of the project is likely to be, using that contractor and the several adjusted estimates prepared along the way.  Your design contract does not distinguish the delivery type, nor spell out specifically the level of information or details you will provide, the depth of specifications, etc. that are to be prepared. 

    Due to circumstances beyond your control, after you have completed the CD's, or nearly so, the Owner decides to switch to 'delivery type Y'.   Or the developer sells the rights to the project to a nominee, who becomes your client.  Or the developer severs his relationship with the contractor and decides to go to open bid, or other twist on what you expected would happen.

    Now what?  Are the CD's you have prepared deficient for whatever type of delivery method the client decides to use (which is, after all, his decision, and can be made at any point in time)?   Do you have to supplement what you have prepared because the CD's are not comprehensive enough for open bidding?  If the CD's are used for open bidding will you live to regret this later - when the eventual contractor comes back with mountains of RFI's and CO's (because the new contractor has a different mindset than the original one, and there are too many holes in the CD's)?  Will you bust your budget re-drafting and bringing the CD's up to snuff?  What about the delay in finishing the CD's and going to bid - who eats that cost?   What about the added C.A. time you will have to spend hand-holding the new contractor, responding to RFI's, issuing ASI's, designing in the field and on the fly, etc.?   And how will you deal with the inevitable errors or omissions (no set of plans is perfect) now that you have a contractor that is not so 'cozy' with the Owner, and is after every  buck he can get out of your mistakes?

    The fundamental question you need to ask yourself is whether the delivery type should dictate the content and quality of the CD's you prepare?  At the end of the day - when you tally up all the time and monies spent on plans, specs, C.A., RFI's, ASI's, errors/omissions, CO's - will the developer or you have actually saved anything?  Will the quality of the project be the same - or better, or worse - due to having spent a few less dollars on up-front design/CD preparation? 

    I understand the realities of the business end... having been in this arena for over 40 years.  I understand how hard it can be to get that client under contract in the first place.  But underlying the economics and politics, getting and keeping clients and making a profit, it is up to the A/E to explain to the client why it is important (and in the end better for the Owner) to spend what it takes to have a complete/comprehensive/correct and detailed set of CD's from which the project can be constructed - regardless of delivery method.  Money saved in front-end professional fees is too often (read that 'most of the time') spent and exceeded during construction when the CD's do not meet that objective... and then the battles begin!

    Your perspectives are more than welcome, as I am always willing to learn something new from others.

    Respectfully,
    -------------------------------------------
    Howard Littman AIA
    Forensic Architect, Expert Witness
    Howard I. Littman, AIA
    Agoura Hills CA
    -------------------------------------------


    AIA Business Academy: A high-impact, four-part intensive program starting June 9. Earn 22.75 LUs. Click here to learn more.


  • 8.  RE:Design Build Documents Content

    Posted 12-10-2013 07:54 AM


    -------------------------------------------
    Michael Clark AIA
    Director Of Design
    H&H Design-Build
    New Albany IN
    -------------------------------------------
    To All:
    I have been in Design-Build for over 22 years and I gave up long ago trying to develop good performance specifications or trying to determine what details the subcontractors need to see.  All projects that come out of my office are prepared the same as Design-Bid-Build documents.  This eliminates a lot of questions and changes.





    AIA Business Academy: A high-impact, four-part intensive program starting June 9. Earn 22.75 LUs. Click here to learn more.


  • 9.  RE:Design Build Documents Content

    Posted 12-10-2013 09:16 AM
    I have had a lot of experience working under D/B contracts and they can lead to very different levels of detail on the drawings depending on who you are working for, and what the nature of the relationship is.  It is important to understand this upfront before you scope your work (and fee).  Most of my contracts have been with a developer, who also servers as (or owns) the general contractor.  In this case I am working as part of a team that is led by an experienced construction professional who is responsible to put the project together.  This is truly a team environment.  The documents that I prepare for this type of project are what I call "minimum-plus".  At the core are the minimum documents to satisfy the needs for regulatory approvals.  The plus becomes what we decide as a team is required to help the subcontractors correctly bid and perform the work.  In a lot of instances, this leads to areas of drawings that are almost schematic - cabinets for instance, may show plan, elevations and colors.  The contractor and I will then work with a qualified subcontractor/fabricator and he will create the details etc.  In other instances, I may produce very detailed drawings for a custom application of a material that a subcontractor may not be familiar with.  I have found this approach to construction can be very satisfying.  With the right partners it can lead to a very creative building solution.  It is amazing the quality of work that you get when you work with the right contractors and subcontractors, and then bring them into the team early on.

    -------------------------------------------
    Robert Humason AIA
    Architect
    ATA Beilharz Architects
    Cincinnati OH
    -------------------------------------------






    AIA Business Academy: A high-impact, four-part intensive program starting June 9. Earn 22.75 LUs. Click here to learn more.


  • 10.  RE:Design Build Documents Content

    Posted 12-03-2013 08:38 PM
    Robin, I do not understand why you believe the delivery method (i.e. design/build v. design/bid/build) would be of any concern to the AHJ. 

    The requirement for document content is the same in either case.  The content must (to the satisfaction of the Building Official) describe the proposed project and contain enough information to ensure the project will be constructed in accordance with applicable codes.

    The codes also clarify, depending on type of project, what professional signatures are required on the submitted plans - the Architect of Record, Engineer of Record, or both.

    Additionally, it is common for certain work to be engineered separately by the contractor, and submitted for separate approvals (i.e. fire protection or similar specialty work).  That separately-engineered work must also be signed by a responsible engineer (even though this is done under the umbrella of the builder and not necessarily the Architect/Engineer of Record).

    In addition to the description of documents found in the code(s), most jurisdictions offer 'cheat sheets' for what they expect to see when documents are submitted. 

    It is true that in a design/build context either the Owner or your 'builder partner' may not want more than minimum information on the documents (the same as when you are asked to prepare a 'builder set' of plans).  There can be many reasons for this mind-set - but at the end of the day any cost savings may be illusory, and the lack of detail may indeed lead to significant problems (as you have mentioned). 

    The caution for anyone in a design/build relationship is to understand that you may be sharing the ultimate liabilities/costs of the minimal set of documents.  If it turns out your builder partner is not as savvy as he thinks he is, you may all pay the price.

    Regardless of a desire to reduce construction document content (the 'details' you refer to) you still cannot provide less than what the code and the Building Official require.  The Building Offical has the last word on what is acceptable (within reason, of course).

    The project delivery method itself is an entirely separate matter.  It is a business matter between the parties in interest.  It does not alter the AHJ's concern - that the documents illustrate how the work, once put in place, will protect the public's health, safety and welfare.

    I hope this is of some help.
    Respectfully, 

    -------------------------------------------
    Howard Littman AIA
    Forensic Architect, Expert Witness
    Howard I. Littman, AIA
    Agoura Hills CA
    -------------------------------------------




    AIA Business Academy: A high-impact, four-part intensive program starting June 9. Earn 22.75 LUs. Click here to learn more.


  • 11.  RE:Design Build Documents Content

    Posted 12-04-2013 07:16 PM
    Howard, good memo.  I would agree with much of what you say . . . if we lived in a perfect world, I think I could agree 100%.  From our experiences, how things should be and actual experiences occasionally diverge.  I sometimes refer to what I see as the ugly underbelly of architecture and construction.  There's lots of $$ passing hands and control can take over where integrity and service once stood.  I don't mean to be or sound so negative, but the distinction may eventually help the profession as a whole.

    I've inserted comments below, in a different text and font size to distinguish my words from yours.


    -------------------------------------------
    Robin Miller AIA
    MSH Architects
    Sioux Falls SD
    -------------------------------------------






    AIA Business Academy: A high-impact, four-part intensive program starting June 9. Earn 22.75 LUs. Click here to learn more.


  • 12.  RE:Design Build Documents Content

    Posted 12-05-2013 06:23 PM
    Robin,

    Much of what you discuss is really 'merits of DB v. DBB', and 'clients who don't want to pay'...  so not really what I was discussing (what is required to submit for a permit).

    Also it feels like you are focusing on 'smaller' projects, esp. your comment re separately-submitted MEP's (which is not at all unusual for small projects, and in some small projects not even a requirement).  On larger projects MEP's are usually designed/documented concurrent with the A and S materials, as it is critical they be coordinated in all of their physical aspects (else you are actively courting problems during construction that will bury you if it is a DB project).  The usual exceptions would be specialty items like fire protection - but even then I would strongly urged they also be designed concurrently and not by the sub after-the-fact.  Shop drawings in some cases are required by the AHJ, but are prepared separately/later, so are a different animal.

    As to cheat sheets, all major cities seem to have them... you just need to ask...  it's the same info taught to their plan-checkers for use when taking in a set of documents (the 'minimum acceptable criteria').  Some have this on line for easy access.

    As to the issue of whether docs 'must' be different when DB v. DBB, I believe my observation stands - the AHJ does not (and should not) have a concern as to what type of delivery method is used.   The documents must stand on their own, and adequately describe the project.  Professional signature requirements also should not vary whether DB or DBB.  If an AHJ is saying they want something different I would question this (I am aware of no rationale for different 'minimum information' requirements).  The contracting method is discretionary and rests solely with the Owner.

    As to retaining control of communications with the Building Official, this is something that simply has to be worked out between yourself and your 'client' or 'builder partner'.  You must keep in mind:  nobody (not even the Building Official) has the right to make any modifications to drawings you have created and stamped, and that includes your client or partner.  You are still the Architect of Record (assuming you are dealing with a project that requires an Architect's signature/stamp).  So if you want to have someone else participate in the dialogue (to assist in expediting reviews or concerns), only the Architect of Record can ultimately incorporate anything that modifies your documents used to obtain permit(s).  If you think a contractor is 'going around' you...  you have the right to remind the Building Official not to discuss changes to your documents with anyone other than YOU, the Architect of Record and owner of the content.  You might get some eyeball rolling, but if you feel strongly about this, I think this is lawful and supportable.

    Respectfully,
    Howard


    -------------------------------------------
    Howard Littman AIA
    Forensic Architect, Expert Witness
    Howard I. Littman, AIA
    Agoura Hills CA
    -------------------------------------------





    AIA Business Academy: A high-impact, four-part intensive program starting June 9. Earn 22.75 LUs. Click here to learn more.


  • 13.  RE:Design Build Documents Content

    Posted 12-03-2013 11:59 AM
    John:  The AIA Contract Documents team provided the below response to your inquiry. You may also contact Contract Documents directly by email at docinfo@aia.org or by phone at 202.626.7526.

    Dear Mr. Biggs: 

    Your recent post regarding detail requirements for Design-Build documents was brought to our attention.  We thought that we might provide the following general information regarding Design-Build in the hopes that it could be of some assistance to you. We cannot, however, provide legal advice relating to your specific circumstances and the following is not intended as legal advice. While we hope the following information is useful to you, we suggest that you consult with a local attorney to the extent you are in need of legal assistance. 

    Your question makes reference to some discussions you have come across relating to performance documents. Generally, performance documents or specifications refer to the level of detail that the Owner is required to give to the Design-Builder as part of the bidding/contracting process. The Owner of a Design-Build project need only provide the Design-Builder a description of its performance needs. The Design-Builder then prepares its own detailed design documents and specifications to satisfy those performance needs, most often though an agreement with an Architect. Performance documents or specifications are not typically applicable to the requirements for the documents an Architect provides to a Design-Builder. 

    From a contracts perspective, typically the Design-Builder/Architect agreement does not provide extensive guidance on the detail required in design and construction documents.  By way of example, AIA Document B143-2004, Standard Form of Agreement Between Design-Builder and Architect, Exhibit B provides the following: 

    § B.4.1 Design Documents. Provide design documents based on the Design-Build Documents defined in Article 1 of A141-2004, Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Design-Builder, other criteria provided by the Design-Builder, the schedule and the budget for the Cost of the Work, all as pertaining to the Architect's Portion of the Project. The documents shall establish the design of the Architect's Portion of the Project illustrating the scale and relationship of the design components . . . . The design documents may include a site plan, building plans, sections and elevations, study models, and perspective sketches. Selections of major building systems and construction materials shall be noted on the drawings or described in outline specifications. 

    § B.4.2 Construction Documents. Provide construction documents based on the approved design documents and updated budget for the Cost of the Work for the Architect's Portion of the Project. The construction documents shall set forth the requirements for construction of the Architect's Portion of the Project. The construction documents shall include drawings and specifications that establish the quality levels of materials and systems required for the Architect's Portion of the Project. 

    The B143-2004 descriptions of the Design Documents and Constructions Documents are very similar to the descriptions found in our Design Bid Build Owner/Architect agreement (B101-2007). To our knowledge, the other standard form agreements published in the industry take a similar approach in terms of required detail.  

    One reason the contracts do not provide extensive guidance on the required detail is that the Architect's services are always governed both by the contractual requirements and the applicable standard of care. Accordingly, even if the contract for services does not provide extensive guidance on the required detail, the Architect is still required to meet the applicable standard of care for its design services. AIA Document B101-2007 describes the standard of care as follows: 

    § 2.2 The Architect shall perform its services consistent with the professional skill and care ordinarily provided by architects practicing in the same or similar locality under the same or similar circumstances.  

    This language is a generally accepted description of the Architect's standard of care and is applicable even if it is not explicitly stated in the contract for services. 

    Unfortunately, we are not aware of any AIA publications that provide guidance on the level of detail required for Design-Build Construction Documents. A quick review of the Design-Build Institute of America's website suggests that they publish a Manual of Practice that may offer some guidance. If you are interested, their website is www.dbia.org, but some of their publications are restricted to DBIA members.  

    We hope this response is helpful. Please feel free to contact us directly with any question about the content or usage of AIA Contract Documents.  

    Documents Information
    AIA Contract Documents
    The American Institute of Architects
    Washington, DC
    docinfo@aia.org | 202-626-7526


    -------------------------------------------
    Susan Parrish
    Manager
    The American Institute of Architects
    Washington DC
    -------------------------------------------


    AIA Business Academy: A high-impact, four-part intensive program starting June 9. Earn 22.75 LUs. Click here to learn more.


  • 14.  RE:Design Build Documents Content

    Posted 12-04-2013 05:40 PM
    You might look into the Design Build Institute of America (DBIA) for some guidance.

    -------------------------------------------
    Gregory Johnson AIA
    Partner
    PhiloWilke Partnership
    Houston TX
    -------------------------------------------






    AIA Business Academy: A high-impact, four-part intensive program starting June 9. Earn 22.75 LUs. Click here to learn more.


  • 15.  RE:Design Build Documents Content

    Posted 12-05-2013 06:34 PM
    Susan,
    Just a brief comment on your posted AIA document cites.

    First, what you post go to the contractual obligations, but do not describe the 'content' required, which is governed by code and the local AHJ.

    Second, the dirty secret of the magic sentence describing the Architect Standard of Care.  This has long been the cited standard, but must be taken in context, and at times with a grain of salt.  If you are practicing in a small town where all the Architects prepare lousy documents, don't know the codes, take on work that is outside their expertise, etc. - in other words all practicing in a manner that is not only professional but possible negligent - that cannot stand as the Standard of Care (even though it is what other licensed Architects in your locale are doing).  Thus the definition is fundamentally flawed (even though contained in an AIA contract).  When pressed to testify a good expert witness would be able to explain why that clause may not hold water in a specific instance.  The 'sample' against which professional practice must be measured has to be a 'sample' that represents proper performance in the first place.  If everyone is 'doing it wrong', that does not set the performance bar. 

    We have the same issue with contractors... some of whom claim that they installed the flashing upside down because they have always done it that way, and so do all the other contractors in town.   Of course, I'm giving an example that is a bit 'stressed' but I think the concept is clear.

    Regards,
    Howard


    -------------------------------------------
    Howard Littman AIA
    Forensic Architect, Expert Witness
    Howard I. Littman, AIA
    Agoura Hills CA
    -------------------------------------------






    AIA Business Academy: A high-impact, four-part intensive program starting June 9. Earn 22.75 LUs. Click here to learn more.