Practice Management Member Conversations

 View Only
  • 1.  OSHA Type Safety Plan for Construction Administration

    Posted 10-25-2013 10:46 AM
    Three part question regarding Safety Plans:

    We are being asked to provide an OSHA Safety Plan for our observation visits by a Construction Manager on a Design-Build project. In the past, we have always complied with a General Contractor's Safety Plan. Has anyone had to do a Construction Site Safety Plan? Any how-to sources? Anyone explored liability issues?

    On this line of thinking, should we be preparing this type of Safety Plan for our staff when we are surveying conditions and/or measuring existing structures in varying conditions?

    Also, this CM tells us that changes in OSHA (or maybe Maryland OSH) effective January 1, 2014 means that design professionals will need to do this on all construction sites. We can not find this regulation change. Anyone know anything about this?

    -------------------------------------------
    Marie Giguere AIA
    Kann Partners
    Baltimore MD
    -------------------------------------------
    AIA Business Academy: A high-impact, four-part intensive program starting June 9. Earn 22.75 LUs. Click here to learn more.


  • 2.  RE:OSHA Type Safety Plan for Construction Administration

    Posted 10-28-2013 05:35 PM

    I would check with your insurance provider and your attorney.
    Historically, Architects avoid being involved with safety issues on a site due to liability issues.
    -------------------------------------------
    Richard Matteo AIA
    Specification Writer
    STV Incorporated
    Irvine CA
    -------------------------------------------






    AIA Business Academy: A high-impact, four-part intensive program starting June 9. Earn 22.75 LUs. Click here to learn more.


  • 3.  RE:OSHA Type Safety Plan for Construction Administration

    Posted 10-28-2013 09:09 PM
    Please do not comply with requests like this from people who just ask us to do free stuff. It sets a different standard of care for design professionals who are not educated, trained, or tested in this area. And and area we need to stay away from. The lawyers in this group need to weigh in why. If you want to research this as an add service and offer in that context along with the risks then go for it. ------------------------------------------- Richard McNeel AIA President JBHM Architects, P.A. Jackson MS -------------------------------------------
    AIA Business Academy: A high-impact, four-part intensive program starting June 9. Earn 22.75 LUs. Click here to learn more.


  • 4.  RE:OSHA Type Safety Plan for Construction Administration

    Posted 10-28-2013 09:46 PM
    I will be interested to read responses from insurers, attorneys or anyone actually involved in OSHA that is monitoring this site. 

    Traditionally, and in accordance with standard construction contract formats (including AIA formats) the contractor is the party in sole charge of the construction site.  This includes physical control and security of the site itself, the safety plan to be followed by all persons on the site, safety of materials/equipment and operations of all kinds, etc.. 

    Visitors to a construction site are required to know/understand and comport with the contractor's safety plan.  The contractor is responsible to ensure visitors to the site (including Owner, A/E, lender and others) have been informed of what is expected of them (i.e. where they can go or not go, what safety gear is required, the times they can visit, whether they must be escorted, to whom they must report on arrival at the site, and/or any other specific restrictions/instructions).   On major projects (and by the way a good idea for ANY project) is that visitors (not a party under direct control of the Contractor) must sign a log sheet when they arrive at a site, and when they leave.  That log should contain a recitation that the visitor is aware of the safety requirements that govern their conduct while on site. 

    While A/E's are presumed to understand the hazards of construction sites (by training and experience), and must conduct themselves accordingly, they are not the ones that formulate the site safety plan.  In fact, this would seem to contradict the standard contract provisions, and expose the A/E, the Owner and the contractor to liabilities not anticipated by their respective contracts (or the types of insurance they are required to carry).

    If, in fact there is a new OSHA regulation on this issue, I've not read or heard of it.  At a minimum I would have expected this to be a major discussion topic among A/E's, since development of regulations is not something that happens overnight.  Such a pending regulation should certainly have been a topic of lobbying (with OSHA) and discourse by the AIA (with its members) during the months/years it was being considered for drafting, passage, adoption and implementation.  The original post says 'effective January 2014'... that is but two months away.

    Even if such a regulation were put in place, one would need a significant lead time before implementation would be realistic.  It can take years to incorporate such thinking into contracts for design and those for construction - and the design and construction process itself can take years.

    How would one deal with projects that are already in the design process (with a signed contract delineating the Architect's responsibilities)?  Would this become an 'additional service' due to a change in government regulations?  In such a short time frame, how would A/E's educate themselves on the requirements, estimate the time/effort it will take to comply with the regulations, and negotiate the additional fees with their clients?  What kind of consultations will A/E's need to engage in with their attorneys and insurers before launching on this new program? 

    How would one deal with this on existing construction projects (already under way, with executed contracts assigning sole responsibility for safety to the Contractor)?  How will the Contractor react to this intrusion into his territory... and how will the lines of demarcation be determined (as between the A/E and the Contractor)? 

    Just a few of the many questions that come to mind:  To whom would the 'plan' have to be submitted?   Who would have to approve it...  the CM (as in the original post), the government, the Contractor (since it's his site), someone else?  How long will it take to develop a safety plan, get it approved, and incorporate it into the design and construction contracts?  Who will be responsible to train the A/E's in the new safety plan?  Who will enforce its implementation?  Who will monitor compliance/non-compliance?  Will there be consequences - and how will they be pursued and enforced on the A/E's?  How will this requirement be incorporated into A/E professional liability insurance policies... at what cost... and how long with it take to create a new policy form/amendment/rider to cover the A/E's new liabilities?  How will the insurance policies of the A/E and the contractor be 'coordinated' in terms of overlapping of responsibilities for what happens on the construction site - and their respective liabilities in the event of an incident/occurrence? 

    This is just an off-the-cuff reaction... I'm sure there are numerous other considerations that can be added to this.

    If this is 'true', and the AIA has not been in the eye of the storm, someone has really missed the boat!

    -------------------------------------------
    Howard Littman AIA
    Forensic Architect, Expert Witness
    Howard I. Littman, AIA
    Agoura Hills CA
    -------------------------------------------



    AIA Business Academy: A high-impact, four-part intensive program starting June 9. Earn 22.75 LUs. Click here to learn more.


  • 5.  RE:OSHA Type Safety Plan for Construction Administration

    Posted 10-29-2013 12:34 AM
    If you have used an AIA Agreement, please review it. If not, you can still review it and the A201 Doc for what the typical roles & relationships are for an architect on the jobsite. In the absence of an agreement that adds more to your scope, these Docs will establish a standard of care / level of services that are normal for architects.

    Based on the implied scale of project, I'm really hoping you have an insurer and can review this with them and their legal counsel. But given a standard scope of services, the push-back on a construction manager / project sponsor who pushes you into this corner are these basic facts:
    • As the contractors are solely in control of their construction site and its players and activities, there is no way that you can be in control of - therefore responsible for - construction site safety. To develop such a safety plan would enlarge your scope & scale of liability beyond your scope of services and expertise as an architect, and well beyond an insurable level. 
    • Risk equals reward in a contract - are you being compensated for this additional risk the CM is shoving your way? I didn't think so.

    What you CAN do is agree to abide by the Contractor's and/or CM's written site safety program(s) as they relate to your staff during their site visits.


    Hope this helps!

    -------------------------------------------
    Bruce Bradsby
    bdb/a
    San Francisco   |   Bangkok

    -------------------------------------------






    AIA Business Academy: A high-impact, four-part intensive program starting June 9. Earn 22.75 LUs. Click here to learn more.


  • 6.  RE:OSHA Type Safety Plan for Construction Administration

    Posted 10-30-2013 06:08 PM
    As I read the initial inquiry, it seemed like the question was "have any of you architects ever been asked for a Safety Plan intended to govern the conduct of your staff during site visits?"

    [Not - has anyone ever created a safety plan to govern the activities of the construction workers ]

    I think it is a reasonable thing to have, perhaps stated as part of a "site visit procedures" document.
       Wear solid-toe shoes / boots
       Wear a high-viz vest or jacket (get a few printed with your company name on them, hang by the back door of your office)
       Wear a hardhat
       Wear safety glasses
       Consider hearing protection
       Have a safe way to carry your notepad, camera, ipad, whatever - need two hands for climbing ladders
       Look around, know what you are walking on and what you're walking under.

    Perhaps ask some of the GCs for copies of their plans on other jobs, and skim off what could apply to the kind of work we do.

    In the case mentioned, it seems to me like the Construction Manager is in a CYA mode and treating the Design part of the Design-Build as just another subcontractor.

    When your liability insurance renewal comes up, ask your broker if having a general safety plan which you review with staff before they go to a jobsite will help with your rates.  Maybe not - this is probably a workman's comp issue - but you could save a few nickels.

    -------------------------------------------
    Joel Niemi AIA
    Principal
    Snohomish WA

    -------------------------------------------

    We are being asked to provide an OSHA Safety Plan for our observation visits by a Construction Manager on a Design-Build project. In the past, we have always complied with a General Contractor's Safety Plan. Has anyone had to do a Construction Site Safety Plan? Any how-to sources? Anyone explored liability issues?

    On this line of thinking, should we be preparing this type of Safety Plan for our staff when we are surveying conditions and/or measuring existing structures in varying conditions?




    AIA Business Academy: A high-impact, four-part intensive program starting June 9. Earn 22.75 LUs. Click here to learn more.


  • 7.  RE:OSHA Type Safety Plan for Construction Administration

    Posted 10-29-2013 06:48 AM

    Not knowing what form of agreement you used for design or what the agreement is for Construction, it's still a pretty good bet that safety is solely the Contractor's responsibility. The search through all contract documents regarding this can't take but a few minutes, I'd suggest you go find all of those references.

    For instance, if you used a B151 for your Agreement, article § 2.6.1.2 ...The Architect shall have authority to act on behalf of the Owner only to the extent provided in this Agreement. The Architect shall not have control over, charge of, or responsibility for the construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the Work,...

    § 2.6.4.2...The Architect's review shall not constitute approval of safety precautions or, unless otherwise specifically stated by the Architect, of any construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures...

    An A201, 2007 states:

    § 3.3 SUPERVISION AND CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES

    ...If the Contract Documents give specific instructions concerning construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, the Contractor shall evaluate the jobsite safety thereof and, except as stated below, shall be fully and solely responsible for the jobsite safety of such means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures. If the Contractor determines that such means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures may not be safe, the Contractor shall give timely written notice to the Owner and Architect and shall not proceed with that portion of the Work without further written instructions from the Architect....

     § 4.2.2 ... The Architect will not have control over, charge of, or responsibility for, the construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, or for the safety precautions and programs in connection with the Work, since these are solely the Contractor's rights and responsibilities under the Contract Documents, except as provided in Section 3.3.1.

     § 4.2.7 ... The Architect's review shall not constitute approval of safety precautions or, unless otherwise specifically stated by the Architect, of any construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures. The Architect's approval of a specific item shall not indicate approval of an assembly of which the item is a component.   

    Article 10 squarely puts this responsibility on the Contractor:

    § 10.1 SAFETY PRECAUTIONS AND PROGRAMS

    The Contractor shall be responsible for initiating, maintaining and supervising all safety precautions and programs in connection with the performance of the Contract.

     Unless you signed some other form of agreement or had an amendment making you responsible for this, the Construction Manager should have no grounds for asking you to do this. If you can't find the Maryland regulation stating your responsibility to provide safety plans, make the Construction Manager produce it. There is a lot of construction law precedent that doesn't end well for Architects who get involved in Construction safety. Last, if the regulation is really out there and starts in January 2014, the CM has no grounds for asking for it prior to the law's enactment unless that is stated in the Agreement.


    -------------------------------------------
    Joel McCreary AIA
    Principal Architect
    McCreary Snow Architects, P.A.
    Columbia SC
    -------------------------------------------






    AIA Business Academy: A high-impact, four-part intensive program starting June 9. Earn 22.75 LUs. Click here to learn more.


  • 8.  RE:OSHA Type Safety Plan for Construction Administration

    Posted 10-29-2013 11:01 AM
    This is intended as general information only and cannot be taken as legal advice . . . . . while I am not aware of what may be happening in Maryland, but nothing in their end of session report suggests anything regarding their version of OSHA was taken up in 2013.

    As for safety plans, they focus on things such as rigging, steel erection, fall protection, etc. (i.e.; means and methods), things that Architects are generally not even remotely involved in.  Unless the Architect directs those activities, then the need for any OSHA compliance plan developed by the Architect is questionable.

    That said, the law on site safety is pretty uniform across the several states and pretty well settled.  Unless the contract allocates site safety responsibility to the Architect, or unless the Architect actively assumes control over site operations and safety, then site safety isn't the Architect's concern.  That isn't to say an Architect who is familiar with construction practices can stand idly by knowing something dangerous is happening without taking some sort of action, but judicial treatment on that subject is pretty uniform in finding that even that low level duty is satisfied when the Architect immediately brings the condition to the attention of the supervisory employee - in effect placing the decision as to how the situation should be handled in the hands of those whose duty it is to handle it.  I have had a number of cases arising out of construction accidents over the years, and even a few where OSHA and / or its state iterations has tried to cite the Architect.  in each case the result has been uniform . . . . OSHA may not cite the Architect for failure to comply with its regulations absent wither 1) a contract term making it the Architect's duty to comply with OSHA; or 2) some facts that suggest that despite the lack of a contract duty, the Architect nevertheless went onto the site and took control of site safety.  I don't know of any case to the contrary.  Indeed, cases where the Architect was vested with liability due to an assumption of responsibility for site safety are extremely rare, and cases where they assumed that duty by virtue of a contract clause appear, at least in modern times, to be virtually non-existent.

    That also said, if anything, developing an independent OSHA compliance plan could arguably be construed as an acceptance of the proposition that the Architect has some obligations for site safety.  

    My suggestion would be to contact your insurance carrier and, and while I know most Architects don't want to hear this, an Attorney familiar with the laws of the state in which you are working as well.  I haven't researched this question exhaustively, but my instinct tells me that the act of developing an OSHA compliance plan is not only not required, it may well have the effect contrary to what was desired in that instead of reducing exposure, it may actually expand it.



     

    -------------------------------------------
    Frederick Butters FAIA, Esq.
    Frederick F. Butters, PLLC
    Southfield MI
    -------------------------------------------





    AIA Business Academy: A high-impact, four-part intensive program starting June 9. Earn 22.75 LUs. Click here to learn more.