Interesting discussion about what members should be paying for, particularly this week when we are all receiving our AIA membership dues invoices (ouch!). While it does seem that we should receive information for free that is generated by AIA staff, who are funded in part by our membership dues, I also see the case that not all AIA members will value this compensation survey equally. So subsidizing the development with our membership dues, making a portion of it available for free to all members (as AIA is doing), and then charging for those that want the more complete and detailed survey, seems like a valid approach.
It does seem, however, that some sort of discount would be appropriate to sole practitioners and small firm practitioners, as the value of information contained in the compensation survey cannot be amortized over as many members. Thoughts?
-------------------------------------------
Michael Strogoff, FAIA
President, Strogoff Consulting
Mill Valley CA
-------------------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 10-21-2013 15:56
From: Anthony Romano
Subject: Architects Compensation Survey
-------------------------------------------
Anthony Romano AIA
Romano Architects
Yorktown Heights NY
-------------------------------------------
I had the same reaction as Eric but did not immediatly respond. I agree we should not be paying OUR organization for OUR information.