Small Project Design

 View Only
Expand all | Collapse all

Residential energy modeling

  • 1.  Residential energy modeling

    Posted 07-05-2024 04:03 PM

    What are small residential firms using for energy modeling? HEED? Open Studio/Sketchup? Sefaira? Autodesk Insight? Most of our residential work is additions and renovations.

    We use Revit so it would be great to be able to use that geometry, but I wouldn't be opposed to using Sketchup.  I'm not sure such an animal exists, but we would love use one software to; show performance based code compliance, provide 2030 Challenge reporting, test different design options and show clients cost savings by investing in the envelope.



    ------------------------------
    Thomas Ahleman AIA
    Studio Talo Architecture, Inc.
    Evanston IL
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: Residential energy modeling

    Posted 07-08-2024 08:28 PM

    CoveTool is the best option.

    https://cove.tools



    ------------------------------
    Aaron Pilat

    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: Residential energy modeling

    Posted 07-09-2024 05:36 PM

    RE Energy modeling for small firms

    I have found that energy modeling and carbon calculating plugins have restrictions on the host drawing tool. We use Revit LT, which is very powerful - but we don't need / can't afford the full version. The carbon software we wanted to use - Tally - doesn't work on LT, only the full version. We developed work arounds, but ultimately it was too much trouble and expense for us, even though we are committed to low carbon design and motivated by the 2030 Commitment. Still looking for an easier solution to calculating embodied carbon. For now, we reduce concrete, steel, glass and fossil fuel materials, and retrofit to Passive House. Still, I'd love to have some numbers.....



    ------------------------------
    Paul Thompson AIA, CPHC
    BluPath Design
    Philadelphia PA
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: Residential energy modeling

    Posted 07-10-2024 05:39 PM

    As a solo practitioner, I'd love to have an affordable, easy-to-use tool. For someone like me, running a dozen projects on my own, it is impossible to learn to use a complicated tool, let alone pay for it. When I contacted Cove Tool about my concerns, how I would use the tool only a few times a year, and how the cost was 10X what I could afford, the response was a deafening silence.

    Another rogue aspect of my firm is that I use Vectorworks, so typical plug-ins built for Revit are lost on me. The industry and this organization need to understand and reflect upon what it takes to run a practice solo and our unique challenges. As fellow architects, being sensitive and not condescending to others in the practice who are "not there yet" would also go a long way. I'm not saying this thread has been condescending, but I often face it from architects, energy testing specialists, and those with more resources than they know what to do within their practice.

    Soap box over.



    ------------------------------
    Lee Calisti AIA
    lee CALISTI architecture+design
    Greensburg PA
    ------------------------------



  • 5.  RE: Residential energy modeling

    Posted 07-11-2024 08:57 AM

    Lee I hear your frustration and I agree in the industry it should not be a one size fits all when it comes to software that supports architectural practice. I work for local government and I am fighting for funding so I can provide Revit to my intern who is dying to use it on our projects.



    ------------------------------
    Andrew Thompson AIA
    Passaic County
    Paterson NJ
    ------------------------------



  • 6.  RE: Residential energy modeling

    Posted 07-11-2024 10:33 AM

    Andrew, 

    Thank you for recognizing my point and for your kind words. All the best in getting your grant funding.



    ------------------------------
    Lee Calisti AIA
    lee CALISTI architecture+design
    Greensburg PA
    ------------------------------



  • 7.  RE: Residential energy modeling

    Posted 07-12-2024 01:39 AM

    Lee, you nailed my frustration as well. I recently attended a Sustainability Symposium, hosted by our local AIA chapter and walked out even more frustrated. When the panel was talking about energy modeling and selecting low carbon footprint materials, it was clear this conversation was for the big firms only. I even asked the panel how this conversation can be applied to smaller firms/projects, and I was literally given the answer, "change the paper towels you use".

    IMHO small to medium sized firms, which are the overwhelming majority of AIA membership, need to work together to push the AIA to represent our needs and advocate for some kind of a public or PPP funded solution to provide our firms this capability. Small scale projects are the overwhelming majority of development in the US (from some CE lectures I have attended it is close to 90%). If our industry wants to really make a difference in climate change, we have to improve the performance of these buildings, and ironically we cannot afford the tools to help change the conversation.



    ------------------------------
    Daniel Blair AIA
    DANKE developement
    Arlington VA
    ------------------------------



  • 8.  RE: Residential energy modeling

    Posted 07-12-2024 07:42 AM

    Daniel,

    I appreciate your honest and eloquent summary of the problem. I chair the AIA PA Small Firm Exchange, and my enthusiasm is driven by most of the points you made. I have spoken with many small firm owners who feel the same but are quiet yet frustrated about it.

    We can critique others, but it's hard to critique ourselves.



    ------------------------------
    Lee Calisti AIA
    lee CALISTI architecture+design
    Greensburg PA
    ------------------------------



  • 9.  RE: Residential energy modeling

    Posted 07-12-2024 08:56 AM

    Daniel thank you for sharing your thoughts and frustrations on this matter. I am on the committee for Small Project Design and this would be a good topic to add to our conversations and an issue we can present at our forum at conference next year.



    ------------------------------
    Andrew Thompson AIA
    Passaic County
    Paterson NJ
    ------------------------------



  • 10.  RE: Residential energy modeling

    Posted 07-10-2024 07:16 PM
    I know that the University of California had developed some free software several years ago that was excellent but we haven't used it recently.  Maybe there is someone who has used it more recently?

    Suzie Van Cleave, AIA







  • 11.  RE: Residential energy modeling

    Posted 07-10-2024 01:43 PM
    I'm also interested in what others are using. We usually hire someone but would love to start doing this in-house since we have the revit models and can duplicate and play with different assemblies. 

    Rand Pinson, AIA

    Architect

    PINE bureau. PDX . CDMX . TX

    p: 334 332 7121  

    www.pinebureau.com | instagram







  • 12.  RE: Residential energy modeling

    Posted 07-09-2024 09:20 AM

    I recommend OneClick, very handy with Revit and you decide on the level of detailing. It does show you compliance with selected by you certificates, codes, standards.



    ------------------------------
    Monika Budniak-Wischmann Assoc. AIA
    HAA
    Grosse Pointe Park MI
    ------------------------------



  • 13.  RE: Residential energy modeling

    Posted 07-09-2024 01:15 PM

    Would be interesting to see if there any free software programs that could be utilized for energy modeling.



    ------------------------------
    Andrew Thompson AIA
    Passaic County
    Paterson NJ
    ------------------------------



  • 14.  RE: Residential energy modeling

    Posted 07-12-2024 12:21 PM

    Thanks all for a great discussion on tools. I put the ask out to the 2030 and Materials Pledge working groups and as a starting response these blog posts were recommended. These are descriptions of different tools available along with short descriptions. Shout out to one of our volunteers Daniel Overbey for writing these for everyone. 

    Energy Modeling
     
    https://danieloverbey.blogspot.com/2024/06/tools-to-help-you-assess-energy.html
    Embodied Carbon
     
    https://danieloverbey.blogspot.com/2024/06/tools-to-help-you-assess-embodied-carbon.html

     

    Please let me know how else we can support small firms interested in sustainability and AIA's pledge programs! 



    ------------------------------
    Melissa Morancy Assoc. AIA
    The American Institute of Architects
    Washington DC
    ------------------------------



  • 15.  RE: Residential energy modeling

    Posted 07-12-2024 12:48 PM

    Thomas, Lee, All:  Great questions, and thanks Melissa for linking to Dan Overbey's piece too.  At our 8 person firm we use Vectorworks, and are just beginning use of its Energos built-in energy modeling tool. Prior to this we used Sefaira with our SketchUp models, but as we've transitioned to Vectorworks 3D are not modeling in SketchUp in the early stages, so Energos will be our modeling tool going forward.  Sefaira is great, and can be bundled with SketchUp so I still recommend it especially if one is using SketchUp already.

    For Embodied Carbon accounting we've dabbled with Vectorworks built-in calculator, based on the ICE (European) database, but our go-to tool is BEAM Estimator (Building Emissions Accounting for Materials) tool, available for free from Builders for Climate Action:  https://www.buildersforclimateaction.org/beam-estimator.html  It's free and easy to use, and right-sized to the projects we do.  It also includes a number of the novel bio-based materials (e.g. strawbale, hempcrete, etc.) which is great (the ICE database has these also).  

    We encourage anyone not already signed up to join the AIA's 2030 Commitment and also the A+D Materials Pledge, and start reporting your portfolio of projects, to track your own progress as well as be part of tracking our c collective progression toward decarbonizing the built environment.  

    Thanks for posting on this important topic!  



    ------------------------------
    David Arkin AIA
    Arkin Tilt Architects
    Berkeley CA
    ------------------------------



  • 16.  RE: Residential energy modeling

    Posted 07-12-2024 01:15 PM

    I'm glad we're starting this conversation. Andrew and Daniel's comments give me hope. Thanks for sharing tools, Melissa.

    Here's the thing: for us solo AIA folks (that's a quarter of all AIA firms!), hitting goals like the 2030 commitment feels a bit out of reach. Why? Because we need tools that help us quickly explain the benefits to clients-benefits for them, not just the planet. After all, our clients are different from those of bigger firms. Firms like mine primarily do commercial renovations, not new construction. Many small firms design super-small residential additions. What about the TI project, coffee shop project, or yoga studio?

    As a solo architect for 21 years, the struggle is real. I do all the work. Running a practice is a full-time job, and learning a complex tool that takes forever to figure out adds to the pile. I can't even afford a part-time accountant. Sometimes, convincing clients to follow basic building codes feels like a battle! The idea of tackling climate action hasn't quite sunk in for them yet. Don't sound surprised, but that's another day over coffee or something stronger.

    And don't even get me started on some of these carbon calculators! They make filing taxes look like a walk in the park. (For those of you with bigger teams, delegating might be an option, but for us solo flyers, it's not.)

    Here's the key takeaway: when discussing these issues, let's not forget about solo architects (or 2 to 3-person firms). I've seen far too many magazine articles and online discussions that treat us like the forgotten child.

    I'm happy to pay a consultant to handle some of this recording and calculating, but most people use Revit. Me? I'm a Vectorworks user, and some folks even use ArchiCAD, SoftPlan, or AutoCAD LT. If we are a genuinely equitable organization, let's ensure "all" means all when providing resources.

    Every year, paying my AIA dues feels a bit tougher. No LLC or employer can pick up the tab – it comes straight out of my pocket. So, let's find ways to make these sustainability goals achievable for everyone, not just the big firms. That way, we can all be part of the solution!



    ------------------------------
    Lee Calisti AIA
    lee CALISTI architecture+design
    Greensburg PA
    ------------------------------



  • 17.  RE: Residential energy modeling

    Posted 07-12-2024 03:18 PM

    Lee, thank you for that breakdown and I hear you! I agree if AIA wants all their members to work towards that goal, big and small firms, big and small projects, the playing field has to be equal. I spoke to the AIA SPD committee and they are excited about this conversation. Let's hope we go from the conversation and put it into action.



    ------------------------------
    Andrew Thompson AIA
    Passaic County
    Paterson NJ
    ------------------------------



  • 18.  RE: Residential energy modeling

    Posted 07-12-2024 03:12 PM

    Thank you Melissa this is a great resource! In addition to small firms it would be good to know how small projects factor into accounting energy usage.



    ------------------------------
    Andrew Thompson AIA
    Passaic County
    Paterson NJ
    ------------------------------



  • 19.  RE: Residential energy modeling

    Posted 07-12-2024 05:43 PM

    As a former responder mentioned, California offers free energy modeling software CBECC-Res2022.3.1.  In addition, it offers free training for this software. It goes beyond the ICC Energy Code, but some may seek that option.

    A few more great energy resources in CA are Energy Code Ace (energycodeace.com), SMUD.org, and PG&E Educational Resources.

    As a sole proprietor, I am always looking to delegate some of the many tasks that CA requires.  In this state there are certified energy consultants.  For all of my projects, I engage a Title 24 Energy Consultant early to collaborate with the energy analysis from the start.  CA requires a Title 24 Energy Analysis for all residential and commercial submittals.



    ------------------------------
    Regina Konet AIA
    Konet Architecture
    FOLSOM CA
    ------------------------------



  • 20.  RE: Residential energy modeling

    Posted 08-02-2024 01:23 PM

    Thomas and all,

    Encouraging to see others that are struggling with an effective energy modeling tool. In June, I was asked by GreenHome Institute to evaluate a few energy-related tools and software, and then to create an hour-long webinar with two others. In the course of doing this, I concluded that Sefaira with SketchUp was the closest to what might be helpful. I was able to get an hour-long personalized demo of Sefaira via Zoom, but then I felt like I was ghosted with follow-ups on details of a trial, costs, etc. Although it could be used via Revit, they had told me that it was easier and quicker to just create the model independently in SketchUp. Only exterior surfaces are needed so the model can be created quickly. I often do that level in SketchUp just for mass model study anyway. 

    For more info on Sefaira which is a plug-in for SketchUp, look at the Case Study for the Net Zero Energy Home: https://www.sketchup.com/en/products/sefaira

    I wonder if as a group, we could get AIA to advocate for us to get special pricing for small firms.  Has anyone tried anything like this before?



    ------------------------------
    Debra Rucker Coleman, AIA
    Architect
    Sun Plans Inc.
    Mobile, AL
    ------------------------------



  • 21.  RE: Residential energy modeling

    Posted 08-05-2024 06:00 PM

    Hi all, late to this party, but for what it's worth--we're a 5-person firm, mostly residential, and we use WUFI-Passive, since we decided years ago we wanted to design Phius certified (Passive) projects. Yes, it's complicated and takes a while to learn, but it does have a SketchUp plugin (for importing SU geometry into Wufi-Passive) and there is a free version. We use the paid version since that allows us to save custom libraries and speed up our workflow. Having done a bunch of Phius certified projects, we now find ourselves offering energy modeling to other firms, diversifying our service offerings. 

    WUFI-Passive lets you save a "Case" and try other versions (Cases) to show comparison of different insulation levels, window performance, etc. And the output is sufficient for our 2030 reporting. We use WUFI-Passive for non-Phius projects as well, in fact we model all our projects in it.

    For embodied carbon modeling we're using the BEAM Tool, free from Builders For Climate Action, pretty easy to use. 

    Cove seemed crazy expensive and set up for bigger projects; but Sefeira, last I checked it out, seemed good and pretty easy to use, but we're comfortable with what we have and doing Phius projects, so no reason to switch.

    We've become a specialist firm (energy efficiency/Net Zero etc) partly because of investing time and money into learning modeling. I know since we're more niche this may not be so applicable, but I hope it's helpful to some. 



    ------------------------------
    Thomas Bassett-Dilley FAIA
    Tom Bassett-Dilley Architect, Ltd.
    Oak Park IL
    ------------------------------



  • 22.  RE: Residential energy modeling

    Posted 08-06-2024 08:36 AM
    Thanks Thomas. Insightful info - esp. that you use the PHIUS software for designs that are not pursuing that certification. I have been told by a mechanical engineer colleague that has used the free version that WUFI Passive Plus has dynamic modeling capabilities and therefore is more accurate than the regular WUFI Passive. Any additional insight into that specific version? The comparison chart of the versions is confusing to me: https://wufi.de/en/software/product-overview/detailed-product-overview/
    Good to know that your firm is experienced in PHIUS and could consult with others. 

    Debra Coleman at Sun Plans
    Sent from my iPhone





  • 23.  RE: Residential energy modeling

    Posted 08-06-2024 07:53 PM

    Debra,

    Thank you for your comments and suggestions for energy-related tools and software (residential or commercial). I use Vectorworks (I'm not a Revit guy), but I wonder if I could export enough geometry to Sketchup or a format for Sefaira. It's a hopeful opportunity, but I've never heard of that software. Thank you for bringing it to our attention.

    After reading a recent article on Green Building Advisor (Pretty Good House Benchmarks and Assemblies-GreenBuildingAdvisor), I noticed that one of the carbon modeling packages (BEAM v1.1) is offered on a sliding scale. I know nothing of this software, but someone finally sees the inequity of a solo practitioner like me paying the same as a larger firm. I would love as many of us as possible to lobby the AIA to push for a sliding scale or special pricing so that small firms have the same access as larger firms. 

    Also, we would need proper training to use it since there is no one else in "my house" to teach me "in-house," as many firms have that privilege. What needs to happen for more to see the inequity in this aspect? In my comments on that article, I shared that the challenge is the steep learning curve of new software tools. Let's be honest: as a solo practitioner architect (like me) juggling multiple projects and managing my firm, it's daunting to dedicate the necessary time to master complex programs like BEopt and Energy Plus (or insert anything else). I don't have the time to master software quickly. Saying "just do it" didn't work for Nike and doesn't work for us.

    As the chair of AIA Pennsylvania's Small Firm Exchange, I'm on board to help find a way for small firms like mine or others to have equal access to tools and training.



    ------------------------------
    Lee Calisti AIA
    lee CALISTI architecture+design
    Greensburg PA
    ------------------------------



  • 24.  RE: Residential energy modeling

    Posted 08-06-2024 08:01 PM
    Hi Debra

    I personally have made a number of 'special pricing for small firms' initiatives over the years. I frankly never found any traction for that concept at AIA National; or frankly other notions for 'member benefits'. I WAS however successful in establishing a program in California through AIACA a number of years ago. The program ran for a few years, with participation from Vectorworks and Archicad. I tried to extend it to Autodesk, Bluebeam and other programs but did not find interest on the part of other vendors.

    Ultimately the greatest success in selling discounted seats and training, was with Archicad. Even though Archicad and Vectorworks are owned by the same company, the software and marketing are completely separate for the products, and they compete directly. Vectorworks dropped out after a two years of very limited sales; and Archicad followed them about a year later, perhaps finding no need to participate if they were the only company doing so.

    Long story short - it's a great idea in my view, but not something easy to implement. I found ultimately there was little interest either on the part of the vendors; or - to my surprise - from architects, most of whom have already chosen the horses they will be riding. Not too surprisingly, none of the companies wanted to offer a break on renewals - likely on the logic that if they already had the customer in their camp, they had little incentive to provide better deals to some customers over others. At that time, the only two products in the marketplace targeting architects that offered perpetual licenses were Vectorworks and Archicad.

    As you know, today virtually all software is on a 'subscription basis' with the 'on going revenue stream' core to the basic business model. Vectorworks was among the last to move away from perpetual licenses. This annual model makes it very difficult for companies to change vendors, as access to your inventory of earlier work now requires an annual payment. Translating from one platform to another is difficult and often barely workable.

    I personally think it's too bad that architects have let the industry dominate the tools essential to creation of what I believe is architects core work product - construction drawings. In fact I coined the term 'partner or parasite' while in the trenches on this endeavor, after analyzing the business models that were taking over the landscape.

    I'm not trying to discourage anyone from trying this ... just offering insight into what the challenges are likely to be.

    Cheers
    Michael F. Malinowski FAIA