No, I am not opposed to any efforts. But it felt to me as if you were both saying,"don't worry, we've already got this covered." Too often, it's either or. And also too often a painless "feel good" move accomplishes little. The idea that we can't deal with the paper is, I don't know, defense of bad practice? No need for naysayers, just let the inventors do their work. Maybe the big players will modify the paper to make onsite recycling possible. I can hope.
respectfully
------------------------------
Mike Mense FAIA
Architect, Writer, Planner, Painter
mmenseArchitect
mensenyc on Instagram
Hamilton Heights, NYC and Snohomish WA
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 06-18-2026 05:19 PM
From: Gail Napell, AIA Member Emeritus
Subject: Reducing Waste
Hi Mike
Are you saying that we shouldn't include recycling requirements in our specifications? I do believe in using the tools we already have, and I also believe we can and should go further.
respectfully
------------------------------
Gail Napell, AIA Emerita, LEED AP BD+C
Citizen Architect at Large
San Rafael CA
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 06-17-2026 09:21 PM
From: Mike Mense, FAIA Member Emeritus
Subject: Reducing Waste
Gail and Anthony
i don't believe your solution works. Reliance on big recycling systems has proved woefully unsuccessful in terms of collection, sorting, reuse and documentation. We need accountable strategies. Recycling onsite will be accountable. Certainly the concerns about the paper can be resolved with the capacities of the cuisinart I mentioned earlier. Consider this a strategy similar to the developing small scale plug and play solar collectors.
respectfully
------------------------------
Mike Mense FAIA
Architect, Writer, Planner, Painter
mmenseArchitect
mensenyc on Instagram
Hamilton Heights, NYC and Snohomish WA
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 06-17-2026 02:30 PM
From: Gail Napell, AIA Member Emeritus
Subject: Reducing Waste
Great reminder of the tools we already have - thank you Anthony!
------------------------------
Gail Napell, AIA Emerita, LEED AP BD+C
Citizen Architect at Large
San Rafael CA
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 06-16-2026 05:33 PM
From: Anthony Brower, FAIA
Subject: Reducing Waste
You can put this in your specifications today. It's not the onsite tool you're looking for, but a contract requirement in the 01 74 19 CONSTRUCTION WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL section.
1.3 DEFINITIONS / H. Soil Amendment: Elements added to topsoil to improve its capacity to support plant life. Compost, peat moss, fertilizer, and gypsum are all viable additives.
1.4 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS / A.1.x.: Gypsum board: Recycle to closed loop gypsum manufacturing facility or soil amendment.
Fun fact about this, if your interior waste subcontractor says they are achieving a 75%-80% average diversion rate and they are not doing this, then they are likely not achieving those rates, at least in the commercial world.
------------------------------
Anthony Brower, FAIA, LEED Fellow
Director of Climate Storytelling
anthony_brower@theclimatearchitect.com
Kansas City
------------------------------