I think I sent this to Michael personally when I really meant to send it to all.
Thank you for your insightful comments. As a past public architect and building official, I support AIA exploring the potential of a Public Architects' fee rate. As seen at the General Meeting earlier this month, the membership is open to being more inclusive by broadening its membership umbrella, however, AIA must do its utmost due diligence to determine exactly what and how new membership categories (student, academics, etc.) are implemented to the best advantage of the Institute, its members and the profession; meaning clear definitions and protocols. The problem with what happened at the General Meeting was that just proposing additional membership categories was just not enough.
I am happy to offer my time to work with AIA staff to make this happen.
Mary Follenweider FAIA LEED AP
2023-24 California Architectural Foundation PresidentMichael,
2022-24 AIA Ventura County President
2021-23 AIA Strategic Council
2017-18 AIA CA VP: Government Relations
telephone: 720-839-4532
Original Message:
Sent: 6/27/2024 11:56:00 AM
From: Michael L. Katzin AIA
Subject: RE: Public Architects Working for Agencies & Annual Dues
Thanks Jim, I understand your neutral position. I was also a Public Architects Committee member and PIA chair when I was a public architect in a county government. When I was a public architect, in architecture practice and now in retirement. I still carry the passion and torch for this issue when and where I can. It is because I believe AIA member public architects can significantly improve public sector development by being inside a public client's organization and being able to impact and lead capital program decisions and capital projects.
In respect to history, I attached a PDF to share some history from almost 25 years ago. I hope anyone who reads this takes a look. It is a briefing to the AIA execs in 2001 during a Grass Roots to John Anderson who was President at the time. These issues are still applicable. The question is if AIA wants to solve this and if they do, when and how AIA initiates a process that solves the concerns expressed then and now.
So, if not now - when? The mayor's connection can be the spark. This issue merits AIA national leadership consideration and action to follow-up with actionable effort with the city mayors and I would add county commissioners as well. The Public Architect's and interested members should back check in the near future how AIA's EVP/CEO Lakisha Ann Woods, and AIA President Kimberly Dowd really do reach out and start a collaborate with the mayors.
Just sharing my passion for this topic,
Michael
------------------------------
Michael Katzin, AIA
Michael Katzin Project Services, LLC
Johns Creek, GA
Member - Johns Creek Planning Commission
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 06-26-2024 10:24 PM
From: James Gallagher
Subject: Public Architects Working for Agencies & Annual Dues
I certainly empathize with your concern about dues. I can tell you that this was a discussion we were having more than 30 years ago. I was the chair of the Public Architects Committee in 1993. I had the privilege of serving under the first woman to be an AIA president.
I will not oppose your efforts to get a special dues structure for AIA members who chose to dedicate their career to work in the public sector. I will not support it either.
I am retired, and no longer working in the public sector. I worked as an owner's architect first in tthe public sector then in the private sector. I never had my employers pay for my dues except when I was working for a traditional design firm.
Those of us who work as the owner's architect play a critical role in the built environment. In fact, I will say that there is no one who has more influence over the process.
When we discussed it in the '90s, we determined that we would like to have a lower dues, but the price we would have to pay would make it a hollow victory. The main concern we would have is that other members would consider us to be less than full members. We did not want to be thought of as charity cases. Another concern was that we wanted to take our place as full members.
At the time I served as chair, in the budget process, the staff tried to downgrade our committee. They did not seem to understand that we and corporate architects are the only clients in the AIA, and they still don't seem to understand that today. They wanted to combine Public and Corporate Architects into one committee, cut our staff support, and reduce our members who would be funded to events. What the staff failed to realize is that public architects are extraordinarily versed in politics. We had three former chairs sitting on the Board. When it was all said and done, our funding remained the same. I received a call from the staff asking, "Can we stop the phone calls now?" Can you imagine what might have happened if we were not paying full dues at that time? That ended any discussion of a new dues structure for many years.
Because I am neither a public architect nor on the committee, I don't think I can speak to the issues you may be facing today. I can, however, advise you on the history that you may not have available to you. Please consider that before you take any action on this.
JIM GALLAGHER, AIA
Former Chair, Public Architects Committee.
Original Message:
Sent: 6/25/2024 5:42:00 PM
From: Michael L. Katzin AIA
Subject: Public Architects Working for Agencies & Annual Dues
I found it very interesting that at the AIA & Mayor's meeting recently held that AIA's EVP/CEO Lakisha Ann Woods, CAE, and AIA President Kimberly Dowdell, AIA, NOMAC, led a delegation to the 92nd annual U.S. Conference of Mayors (USCM) June 20-23 in Kansas City, Mo., delivering the message that architects and mayors should be partners for progress.
From a recent AIA article about this, the AIA was told by mayors they would like an architects' database to use for recruiting architects to sit on board and commissions and to help with major projects. Mayors shared that their biggest challenge in collaborating with architects is funding. AIA leaders met individually with more than 15 U.S. mayors and connected with hundreds of other municipal leaders to listen and learn of their challenges and offering solutions from the architect's perspective.
I recommend that the AIA leadership create a Public Architects membership rate specifically for those architects that work in a public agency. Many, if not most agencies, especially at the city and county level do not pay the high annual dues.
I have been advocating for this for almost 20 years since I was involved with the older Public Architects "PIA." The committee at that time was able to get leadership to bring it to the board in an agenda item. It died there. Seems the practitioners that make up a majority do not care so much to create a special dues structure for licensed, public architects.
I hope the current leadership takes action and follow's up to that conversation at a mayor's conference.
Link to Article: Mayors, architects unite at U.S. Conference of Mayors | The American Institute of Architects (aia.org)
------------------------------
Michael Katzin, AIA
Johns Creek, GA
Member - Johns Creek Planning Commission
------------------------------