New York State requires all state agencies to use QBS for projects over $25,000.
We had a bill which passed both houses this year to extend this requirement to public authorities and public benefit corporations, but it was vetoed by the governor recently. The governor's veto message stated that requiring public authorities to use QBS would restrict their ability to negotiate for the "best value" and limit the ability of new or diverse firms to win state contracts. Further, the veto message stated that requiring PAs and PBCs to identify at least 3 firms would harm projects in rural areas or where there is a need for very specialized projects.
While this veto does not affect the current law which requires QBS for state agencies, I am getting concerned that "best value" is becoming the preferred terminology over "most qualified." Additionally, the rampant advance of M/WBE goals/mandates (30%) is driving a narrative that QBS discourages the use of M and W firms.
------------------------------
Michael Burridge
Director of Government Affairs
AIA New York State
Albany NY
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 01-05-2018 09:40
From: Tilman Wheeler
Subject: QBS under attack?
Here in Tennessee we have enjoyed strong QBS statute for many years. We are beginning to see signs and get the sense that QBS may be coming under a somewhat significant attack during the 2018 legislative session. Are other states which have QBS in place seeing similar things at this point? If so, are there any success stories or "things to watch for" that we should be aware of?
Thanks so much
------------------------------
Tilman "Trey" Wheeler AIA
Partner
Cogent Studio, LLC
Chattanooga TN
------------------------------