Construction Contract Administration

 View Only
  • 1.  Site Visit Check List - Structural and MEP

    Posted 27 days ago

    I have been struggling with teaching green individuals items to look out for when on-site, particularly in the MEP and Structural realms. This is more so to let the other disciplines know of items they may want to check out for when they are on site; e.i. splines of the PT bolts being snapped or not. I've other Mechanical, Electrical, and Structural Engineers put eyes on architectural items as a courtesy in the past, and it has been wonderful to have the additional set of eyes, especially on different days, with how quickly construction can move. 

    Does anyone have suggestions or a list of items to watch out for?

    Thank you.



    ------------------------------
    Shaili Patel AIA
    Colby Company Engineering
    Palmer AK
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: Site Visit Check List - Structural and MEP

    Posted 26 days ago

    This is a great question and I can't wait to see the response from others. 

    For MEP items (depending on construction progress):

    • Fixtures mounted securely, square, and plumb with no leaks. Once had an entire sink rip away from the wall on final inspection. Mounted directly to the metal studs with self tapping screws and no blocking.
    • Pipe / Duct insulation matches specs for thickness and material. No mysterious stains or damaged sections.
    • All fire, natural gas, utility piping is either painted the correct color or marked with directional indicators (or both).
    • Floor, sink, and shower drains flow freely. Once had concrete polishers knock a cover off a floor drain and fill it with wet grind concrete sludge. 
    • Pipe and duct penetrations sealed and / or insulated.
    • HVAC or building controls recognizing all components and communicating to network (if applicable)
    • Maintenance and inspection plates on equipment (filter change housings, VRF covers) are accessible and facing the correct direction / orientation.
    • No metal shavings, debris, or dust contaminants inside ductwork. Once had an HVAC contractor leave registers and louvres uncovered while other trades were working which allowed drywall dust and sawdust into the intake.
    • All filters are installed / new prior to turnover. 
    • All equipment grounded to bus bar or grounding ring including lightning protection system.
    • Breakers labelled and not tripped or tagged.
    • Conduit, wire, piping etc not in contact or rubbing where vibration could cause damage. 
    • All shipping / packing / bracing dunnage has been removed from equipment.
    • Emergency lights work in test mode.

    I'm sure theres more out there. 



    ------------------------------
    Michael Sheu
    Ohio Army National Guard
    Blacklick OH
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: Site Visit Check List - Structural and MEP

    Posted 26 days ago
    Great list.  I suggest adding, during an architect site review when the systems are activated and energized, to make sure none of the operating HVAC units or pump equipment units are too loud in occupied spaces that 1) have suspended ceilings, or 2) especially in occupied, exposed structure spaces.  The architect during a site walk should backcheck the mechanical engineer's dB criteria and approved equipment from submittals. At least check conference rooms and break rooms.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------

    Michael L. Katzin, AIA

    MK Project Services

    e|  mlkatzin@gmail.com

    Member | City of Johns Creek Planning Commission

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------






  • 4.  RE: Site Visit Check List - Structural and MEP

    Posted 26 days ago

    Structural: 

    Five 5-gallon buckets of "shiners" hauled off of a 35,000 SF wood-framed store roof. Structural engineer saw them from below. Contractor had to drive them all back out, renail, then pull out all the nails sticking out. That way they could see where not to fire their nail guns.

    Someone checked one nut for tightness at an exposed timber-franed canopy. The nut, washer, and 2" of threaded rod came off in his hand. Rod was in a hole about 1-1/2" deep. Bolts from other side were about 2" long, also into shallow holes. Someone could not be bothered to drill through the beam and buy bolts the correct length.

    HVAC 

    Employees in a just-constructed branch bank complained of new building smells and other aromas. Detailed investigation included removing supply grille on a sidewall diffuser. Sitting in the duct was half of someone's sandwich from months before.

    Architect/ HVAC

    20+ years after completion, a piece of mechanical equipment in a penthouse needed to be replaced. GC's PM was surprised to find it had to be totally dismantled to take it out the 36" door into the room. Apparently it was installed before building walls and roof were completed. Mechanical engineer didn't tell architect about sizes from future replacement.  Architect didn't ask.

    I was the architect.  GC's PM was my son, whose career is in construction management. Some good-natured teasing followed.

    Replacement unit was carried up stairs in sections and assembled. 



    ------------------------------
    Joel Niemi AIA
    Joel Niemi Architect
    Snohomish, WA
    ------------------------------



  • 5.  RE: Site Visit Check List - Structural and MEP

    Posted 26 days ago

    Michael, I'm concerned about what is and is not part of the professional Standard of Care to which architects are held legally accountable. I've practiced architecture since 1988 in California, Utah, New England, Indiana, South Carolina, Washington, North Dakota, and a few projects here and there in other states. And on every project I worked on in that time and those places, the items you mentioned have been considered far beyond our Standard of Care. In the states where I have practiced, this list would be considered an "inspection" list and inspections are clearly outside the average architect's capabilities and responsibilities. I wouldn't even hold the mechanical and electrical engineers to this standard, out of a desire to not expand our professional Standard of Care beyond the level at which the average architect is capable of performing.

    That doesn't mean we ignore construction defects that we notice. Our professional Standard of Care requires us to notify the builder and the owner of any such defects. However, I've never practiced in a jurisdiction in which this level of scrutiny was expected.

    I'm curious to know how the experiences of other architects on this forum, practicing in other states, have differed from my experiences.



    ------------------------------
    Sean Catherall AIA
    Murray UT
    ------------------------------



  • 6.  RE: Site Visit Check List - Structural and MEP

    Posted 25 days ago
    Hi Sean, we have a different perspective about this item I simply just suggested to add to your list. 

    In regard to SOC - the AIA agreements state,"The Architects shall perform services consistent with the professional skill and care ordinarily provided by architects practicing in the same or similar locality under the same or similar circumstances."

    The term ordinarily is not a one size fits all situation as it relates to different building types. It is different for say a small retail development and office buildings compared to say, a teaching hospital, a museum, a higher-ed or an S&T project. I know this is a very focused and detailed CA topic but it fits your list. Your list is excellent for review with staff and especially in a firm's continuing education program in a CA process session especially in firms doing sound sensitive building types.

    It is a construction phase topic that can be easily reviewed during a site inspection visit. Excessive mechanical equipment sound is not just a post-construction defect issue, it is a potential design E&O issue.  After 45 years of practice and managing claims in a large design firm and also in an A/E firm, I have learned you just can't count on your architectural peers, your insurance carrier, a mediator, arbitrator or jury on how they might perceive what is "ordinary."

    If an excessive equipment sound level problem is caught at punch-list or post-construction when the building is occupied the potential error will cost much more to solve and the architect will have to expend much more unbillable hours to handle the issue. I find that the topic is a design issue and not a post-construction E&O issue. 

    Call me offline to chat if you like.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------

    Michael L. Katzin, AIA

    M K Project Services

    e|  mlkatzin@gmail.com

    Member | City of Johns Creek Planning Commission

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------