Project Delivery

The A441 between Contractor and Subcontractor adopts by reference the A142 between the Design-Builder and Contractor. What happens when the Design-Builder and Contractor are the same entity? I don't believe a company is able to enter into contract with itself. How should the A441 be framed when no A142 exists? Any help or insights greatly appreciated!

As a sidenote, I find it immensely frustrating that the AIA's Help resources are unable to address questions like these. Each time I've sought guidance from the organization, they only defer to my legal counsel. I find it strange that the AIA is unable to answer questions about its own document library. Feels kind of like a car manufacturer telling you to ask your driving instructor how the car works.

The A441 between Contractor and Subcontractor adopts by reference the A142 between the Design-Builder and Contractor. What happens when the Design-Builder and Contractor are the same entity? I don't believe a company is able to enter into contract with itself. How should the A441 be framed when no A142 exists? Any help or insights greatly appreciated!

As a sidenote, I find it immensely frustrating that the AIA's Help resources are unable to address questions like these. Each time I've sought guidance from the organization, they only defer to my legal counsel. I find it strange that the AIA is unable to answer questions about its own document library. Feels kind of like a car manufacturer telling you to ask your driving instructor how the car works.

I think that the contractor-subcontractor Agreement is an AIA attempt to be all-inclusive of possible documents for a project. 

What are the differences between the D-B subcontract and a "normal" subcontract, comparing AIA apples to AIA apples? 

Frankly, what does it matter?  If there is a GC, that's where the buck stops on the responsibility side, isn't it?

Stipulating the use of a certain subcontractor agreement is almost over the line of dictating means and methods.

If you would ask a subcontractor about the "sign this or we will talk to someone else" subcontract agreements they are given, I would bet that those agreements are more onerous than the AIA one. 

And, yes, someone may need to look at the AIA Agreement with local state laws in-hand.  One size fits all does not cover every eventuality in the local courts.  You might want to avoid putting yourself into a position where you are doing lawyering..

Design-Build Institute of America and the AGC "Consensus" documents may have some variations, too, worth considering, if you do need to get to this level of detail.  

The A441 between Contractor and Subcontractor adopts by reference the A142 between the Design-Builder and Contractor. What happens when the Design-Builder and Contractor are the same entity? I don't believe a company is able to enter into contract with itself. How should the A441 be framed when no A142 exists? Any help or insights greatly appreciated!

As a sidenote, I find it immensely frustrating that the AIA's Help resources are unable to address questions like these. Each time I've sought guidance from the organization, they only defer to my legal counsel. I find it strange that the AIA is unable to answer questions about its own document library. Feels kind of like a car manufacturer telling you to ask your driving instructor how the car works.