Thank you Mr. Rawlings for your comments defending the licensing in the profession. Sadly and perhaps in an effort to grow members and income, many non-licensed individuals are now in the AIA, which perhaps is how Mr. Kawecki is in - I did not see a Texas Architecture license in his name on the
http://www.tbae.state.tx.us/PublicSearch/ website.
Perhaps I did not look hard enough. We are the author of our own misfortune letting non-licensed people into the "club", again to support and sustain Years ago many very good architects were not AIA, and at least 6 revered individuals now passed come to mind. Reading about them and their practices confirms they had draftersmen and 'architects to be' in their offices over the years, while they themselves also worked on the 'drafting boards'. Once CADD produced docs became the norm, and all the 3-D abilities that followed made the simple task of preparing constrution docs less the purview of licensed architects, but created by 'cadd staff'. If the architects couldn't or wouldn't learn CADD back in the 1980's, they were left behind, held hostage by Cadd staff. Now those 'cadd software companies' hold us hostage with new updates, etc. etc. making it more expensive to keep up while growing the chasm between us licensed people that take responsibility and liability, and those that get paid to produce the "product".
The attrition as a result of the economy will weed out many, but likely will force AIA to further 'grow' membersip with non-licensed members.
I went off topic to illustrate the bigger problem that has resulted in Mark Lawrence's original query. I am interested in comments on this from others.
Thanks in advance.
-------------------------------------------
Mary Graham AIA
-------------------------------------------