This message has been cross posted to the following Discussion Forums: Housing Knowledge Community and Custom Residential Architects Network .
-------------------------------------------
Is anyone else bothered by the lack of variety exhibited in this year's design award winners?
Yes, the projects are innovative and stunning. Of the 36 award winners, there are eighteen projects which consist of custom homes, speculative homes, affordable housing, multifamily and whole house renovations. Of the 18, 14 are what I would consider to be "Euro-boxes" and 4 are what I would call "Modern Sheds". None of these look like houses, or look domestic or have any stylistic precedent.
Don't get me wrong, I love Euro-boxes and Modern Sheds. However this is "a magazine of The American institute of Architects". Should there not be a better cross-section of styles that better represents the demographics of residential architects within the institute - and the profession at large? There were over 800 entries, yet five of the six custom homes look like they could be from the same architect.
The editorial talks about designing for the 99%. Yet, I doubt the majority of the 99% would warm up to these homes. Instead, most will do what they always do - call a builder!
-------------------------------------------
Edward Shannon
Waterloo IA
-------------------------------------------