Custom Residential Architects Network

 View Only
  • 1.  Architects and House Builders

    Posted 11-26-2012 09:14 AM
    I had a short, but interesting conversation with my mother-in-law over the weekend that was a bit eye-opening. She once again brought up the idea of building a new house (this has been on again, off again for a few years) and had been looking at plans from XYZ Builders saying there was one she liked. I said I could always draw up the house for her, then she could have the rooms exactly the way she wants them, exactly where she wants them. After a brief pause, she said "But I would want them to build it.".

    Until that moment, it had never occurred to me that people believe if you contact a builder, they will only build the plans which they offer. She thought they would not build anything designed by an architect.

    She also mentioned she liked a craftsman style that they offered. I'm not sure if this was her way of saying, architects only do crazy, modern stuff or if she was just saying that's what she liked. After her first comment, it wouldn't surprise me if she believes that we only do what we want to and never listen to the client (I know that this falls in line with common misperceptions already).

    My mother-in-law is a pretty average lady and if she believes that home builders only build their set of spec plans, then I would say a good percentage of the population also believes that. It seems like we might need to work with more builders to eliminate this perception and change the idea of "custom" from granite countertops to entire floor plans and design.

    -------------------------------------------
    Brenda Nelson Assoc. AIA
    Woodruff Design, LLC
    Ankeny IA
    -------------------------------------------


  • 2.  RE:Architects and House Builders

    Posted 11-27-2012 09:54 AM
    Brenda,
    I had a couple of family members do the same thing when I was a student and an intern. Now that I have a huge portfolio of built work with very happy clients and I've had time to work on my persuasion tactics, it's easier to convince many folks of the benefits of a true "custom" design. Part of this attitude amongst the average person is simply because we're viewed as a huge extra expense, but the reality is reality. The builder offers an actual built home while we're offering them an instruction manual which puts them back in the same position of finding the builder. One stop shopping is very desirable to average Americans and we won't change that, so why fight it?

    I'm sure everyone is getting tired of seeing these numbers, but this should put it into perspective as to why people rarely think of us when it comes to a home.

    2006 Census
    1.6 million total houses
    1.3 million were speculative houses (built to sell)
    320,000 were custom built for home owners
    50,000 were likely to have been designed by Architects (3% of the total)
    170,000 commercial buildings

    220,000 total buildings designed by Architects
    1,550,000 total buildings designed by amateurs...think about that.

    This is why I team up with builders. About 90% of my work comes to me through builders I've worked with before. Many of these builders get their leads from real estate agents. We should be much friendlier to agents, since many people come to them first. I know the fee thing stings, but we're not going to fix that whining about it all the time. If we want people to value us more than agents, then we need to get out there and make ourselves available to regular people. Since we design so few houses, few clients think of the Architect, they think of the builder. This year about 60% of my houses are unique, one of a kind, speculative houses designed for a builder. 30% or so are houses custom designed for homeowners that hired a builder first. Only 10% of the projects come from homeowners that seek me out directly. Most of my new houses have construction costs between $200K and $500K. Many of my projects (including spec houses) are renovations and some can cost as little as $50K while I have some over $1 million.

    I highly recommend taking those small renovation jobs from your neighbors and getting involved in the neighborhood where you live. Small jobs always lead to bigger ones. My full time business was built by taking on the jobs other Architects normally reject. There is no job too small, even now that I'm established. If you stand behind your work, you should be proud of sharing it with your immediate community, even if it's just a screen room, a deck, or a Kitchen expansion. I volunteer to design wheelchair ramps for the annual Martin Luther King Community Service Day, where we design/ build ramps for the elderly residents of modest means. The paycheck is one part Karma and one part the marketing in the local paper. It's hard to hate on the Architect that designs wheel chair ramps for free for poor elderly people.

    I think too many Architects have drawn a line in the sand as to how low they will go when it comes to a project and this is part of our problem. I make my best money per hour on the smallest projects. Based on my experience working for other Architects, I often see us trying way too hard to be excellent and not designing very efficiently. When you put in 90% effort for 10% better results, there's a problem $$$. The design concept should speak for itself and when working for regular people, why spend 20 hours designing a $10K handrail for a deck project that will never get built properly and the homeowner can't afford? You have to understand WHO you're working for. Give the homeowner a design that solves their problem in an elegant way that's affordable and more likely to get built properly without your supervision. You can get good results from average builders without overcomplicating the design. If the homeowner never has to see you again after you give them the final drawings, this makes it look like you did your job properly. This leaves clients very happy! Trust me, clients don't think you're an amazing, misunderstood artist when you're constantly at the job site explaining the design only to find out adjustments need to be made that may create change orders (regardless of who is at fault). The stereotype isn't that we create the most wonderful affordable houses, it's that we overcomplicate things and ultimately cost the owner lots of money.

    When we try too hard it reminds me of the nerd who can't understand why he's not popular. My little brother, bless his heart, is absolutely brilliant! He's never been popular, socially, because he's always telling everybody everything he knows at every chance he gets. He's a know it all. He leaves nothing to mystery, he's always showing all his cards. No one likes a know it all. In a fit of insecurity about our position in this society, we often act like the know it all and it repels people. We need to simply show them why they need us instead of always telling them why we're better while refusing to work on the "undesirable" projects. 1.3 million of the houses built each year are speculative houses and they're the most God awful buildings being constructed, yet they are the houses most people are buying. We sound like "know it alls" when we talk poorly of track houses without doing anything about it. It's a delivery model that works for regular people and we're not going to eliminate it, especially by badmouthing or ignoring it. That's why 60% of my projects are unique, one of a kind speculative houses and they happen to sell quicker and for more money. Builders see value in design when their houses consistently sell for more. More of us need to be doing this if we want regular people to think we're cool, rather than know it all nerds. 


    -------------------------------------------
    Eric Rawlings AIA
    Owner
    Rawlings Design, Inc.
    Decatur GA
    -------------------------------------------








  • 3.  RE:Architects and House Builders

    Posted 11-28-2012 09:57 AM
    Eric, as often before, you bring to focus the enormity of the lack of involvement of architects in the majority of construction projects.  In an AIA survey last year we were asked what we saw as the largest issue facing our profession today.  (or something to that effect)  I wrote that in my opinion it was the split from the construction connection. When I obtained my license, part of my construction experience counted toward the intern years.  Two years of construction counted as one year under an architect. I learned so much in those years that I did not get in school or otherwise in a office. Much had to do with attitude and learning how to cooperate. And yes I also learned that more information on drawings is not always better.

    So, I applaud your efforts to continuously post about the need to connect with builders as well as everyone else we meet.  I wonder if we could start a nationwide program that could be duplicated at the local AIA level to encourage more collaboration of the many professionals in the planning stages?  The USGBC and LEED is already emphasizing the integrated design process and who better to LEAD the process than the architect? We could call it BUILDING LEADS or some other all encompassing phase that reached further than architects even though I see AIA as leading the efforts.  I would see education about the entire planning process (esp. for the consumer) as an essential part.

    Wondering if others know of related efforts that have been done with regional AIA chapters?

    -------------------------------------------
    Debra Rucker Coleman, AIA
    Architect
    Sun Plans Inc.
    Mobile, AL
    -------------------------------------------



  • 4.  RE:Architects and House Builders

    Posted 11-29-2012 10:08 AM

    Eric,

    I understand your enthusiasm, and I, too advocate for better architect/builder relationships.  However, one thing that throws me for a loop with your numbers is the generalization about spec homes.  To me there are differences between spec homes and developer (track) housing.  One of the main differences is shear volume.  What are the volumes of housing units that the builders that you work with build?  Outfits such as D.R. Horton, Pulte, Lennar, Centex, KB Homes, etc. build in very large volumes and altogether probably comprised a vast majority of that 2006 1.6M number.  Given the way that these outfits operate in our economy, (not to mention their corporate structures) they are probably hard nuts to crack.  I don't envy the architects/gunslingers that attempt to go after them, but maybe I am part of the problem.

    -------------------------------------------
    Ken Brogno AIA
    Architect AIA LEED AP
    San Francisco CA
    -------------------------------------------








  • 5.  RE:Architects and House Builders

    Posted 11-30-2012 07:36 AM
    Technically, a speculative home is any house that is built or improved for the sole purpose of being sold on the open market to an unknown buyer. There are many, many different iterations of this typology and according to the US Census in 2006, out of 1.6 million houses constructed, 1.3 million were "built to sell". The Big Box builders certain produce the majority of these houses and do so through mass production. This is a reality that is not likely to change as there is a need for it. Personally, I don't participate in designing those houses, but that doesn't mean Architects should not find a way to provide services for that type of work. I designed 24 spec houses this year and each one is a one time, unique design. I worked with 5 different builders this year on those 24 houses. Three of the builders only built one house with me and they were all renovations. I've worked with 2 of them in the past. Those three builders also hire other Architects and Designers and I would assume they renovated no more than 5 houses each this year. I have a builder that hired me to design 3 spec houses, 2 renovations and one new. The remaining 19 spec houses were built with the same builder and all of those were new. I believe I'm the only Architect they are using. All of my spec work is in the inner city areas.

    -------------------------------------------
    Eric Rawlings AIA
    Owner
    Rawlings Design, Inc.
    Decatur GA
    -------------------------------------------








  • 6.  RE:Architects and House Builders

    Posted 12-03-2012 12:55 PM

    With all due respect, there are many architects that do exactly what you describe as your practice.  As far as participating in the tract house building businesses, maybe not so many architects persue that work.  I am not sure that I see your point about architects running away from the spec home market, in so far as they aren't tract homes.  Maybe that wasn't your point?

    -------------------------------------------
    Ken Brogno AIA
    Architect AIA LEED AP
    San Francisco CA
    -------------------------------------------








  • 7.  RE:Architects and House Builders

    Posted 11-30-2012 08:41 AM
    Ken - the large merchant home builders you mention have in-house architects that design their homes. Is the design good? Not very, but its hard to call them as not designed by architects. I think the numbers of small and medium size builders that Eric is talking about, that don't have design in house is quite vast. I don't have numbers but I would not be surprised if the number of housing units put up by these smaller companies were more than the large merchant builders.

    -------------------------------------------
    Gregory La Vardera
    Architect
    Gregory La Vardera Architect
    Merchantville NJ
    -------------------------------------------