Hello Peter, I agree. We as architects have a responsibility to produce quality documents. It is important that clients understand that is takes a fee commensurate with the amount of time and effort required on the part of the architectural and engineering firms to produce excellent documents. And that seasoned experts are creating those documents. It is interesting that some of us might be criticized (often by contractors, particularly in custom residential architecture) for trying to detail and specify many things in projects to keep their firm and others out of the sorts of problems that you mention, to insure smooth construction and try to insure that no one becomes so frustrated with incomplete documents that they resort to legal means to resolve their concerns.
I agree with you that it is incumbent on A/Es (Architects and Engineers) to do as thorough a job as possible to avoid construction RFIs and Change Orders (which, as we know, clients hate) due to in accurate or incomplete documents. The objective, when preparing Construction Documents (CDs) should be; zero litigation, along with simply trying to keep the faith of our respective professions' obligations and dare I say it: enjoyment of doing a good job. Satisfaction that we have done everything we possibly could have done to result in a problem-free build. That our work will withstand the intense scrutiny of our peers should we ever have our work examined by a Board of Architecture. That anyone, anywhere, reviewing our documents will say: "Yes, this work meets or exceeds the Standard of Care required by this State."
The first issue is: conveying to a new client how important their investment in a quality set of documents is and that they need to pay the A/E for that.
-------------------------------------------
Rand Soellner AIA
Architect/Owner/Principal
Home Architects
Cashiers NC
-------------------------------------------