Technology in Architectural Practice

 View Only
  • 1.  Perceived vs. Realized Benefits of Integrated Practice

    Posted 04-27-2012 12:40 PM
    This message has been cross posted to the following Discussion Forums: Technology in Architectural Practice and Center for Integrated Practice .
    -------------------------------------------
    Whichever contract type we employ (by choice or not), architects have demonstrated that Integrated Practice has enhanced the value of design and project delivery.  AIA members who have undertaken Integrated Project Delivery are reporting higher confidence in achieving high-performance design, leaner schedule, cost predictability, and operation efficiency (check out the latest AIA survey sent to 10,000 members): 

    "Survey Shows Growing Awareness of IPD, But Barriers to Wide Adoption Remain
    Most AIA members say that collaborative delivery methods make projects more efficient and predictable."

    http://www.aia.org/about/initiatives/AIAB094213

    How should architects articulate and interpret such value propositions to owners?

    -----------------------------------------------------------------
    Calvin Kam AIA, PhD, PE, LEED AP
    bimSCORE.com
    2010 & 11 Chair, AIA Technology in Architectural Practice
    2011 & 12 Co-Chair, AIA Center for Integrated Practice
    -----------------------------------------------------------------


  • 2.  RE:Perceived vs. Realized Benefits of Integrated Practice

    Posted 04-30-2012 08:36 AM
    Important questions from Mr. Kam.

    The additional question, not asked in the article, is:  Does IPD lead to more profitable business operations for architectural firms?

    -------------------------------------------
    Philip Kabza AIA
    Partner and Dir Technical Services
    SpecGuy
    Charlotte NC
    -------------------------------------------