Technology in Architectural Practice

 View Only
  • 1.  Distribution of Documents Electronically

    Posted 09-14-2010 08:02 AM
    This message has been cross posted to the following Discussion Forums: Practice Management and Technology in Architectural Practice .
    -------------------------------------------
    As I am sure most firms are, we are being asked more and more often to distribute our construction documents electronically during the bidding and during the construction phase of our projects.

    I am looking for any information that might be usful in setting company polices in regards to this, pro's and con's in regards to releasing documents electronically and any other information that might be useful concerning this.

    Thank you in advance,

    Jim

    -------------------------------------------
    James Stumbo AIA
    Stewart Cooper Newell Architects
    Gastonia NC
    -------------------------------------------


  • 2.  RE:Distribution of Documents Electronically

    Posted 09-14-2010 10:46 PM
    James:

    As an architect(in my country) when I need to "distribute" my documentation (if is needed or requested), I use the Acrobat Pro to manage different levels of security and put a watermark in my documents, in that case when someone try to print, the program shows a warning....It can´t be printed..... or if they´re able to print, the documents appears with our logo and a crossed warning (void... for informational purposes.... or anything in my mind....)

    I hope this could help you

    -------------------------------------------
    Rodrigo Godoy Alcarraz
    Architect Principal
    Landskron & Godoy Architects
    Santiago, Chile

    -------------------------------------------


  • 3.  RE:Distribution of Documents Electronically

    Posted 09-15-2010 05:34 AM


    -------------------------------------------
    Gregory Burke AIA
    President
    Gregory J. Burke ' Architect, PA
    Vero Beach FL
    -------------------------------------------
    These requests have been an issue since the mod-1990's when more architects were going to CADD production.  As a technical director at one of the nation's largest firms, I and my collegues formed a policy that I am sure is still in use today.

    As Rodrigo stated in his Blog, Acrobat was used.  Many subs started to request CADD files.  We did form a policy that CADD files would be distributed at a price with a certified check in hand prior to issuing.  All title block information would be removed from the file.  A .pdf file would be sent to the sub contractor with a copy of the file sent to our server.  A separate file was created to track these transmissions.

    We inevitably got an arguement from the sub about paying for the CADD file.  We would ask how much it was going to cost them to produce shop drawings without the CADD files.  There cost was by far more expensive than the cost of the file.  We also asked if their price to the owner was effected by the savings in producing the shop drawings.  Strangely, we very seldom got a reply to that question.

    My advice is to make sure you discuss this with your professional liability insurance carrier.  Mine provided me with language for a form that had to be signed by the Owner or any other party that wanted a CADD file.  Be ccautious, think before you grant these requests.  Pdf files are okay with the watermark, but CADD files are another subject.







  • 4.  RE:Distribution of Documents Electronically

    Posted 09-15-2010 10:00 AM
    We have also seen an increase in requests for documents to be released electronically during bidding.  We have seen requests for CAD backgrounds during construction for quite a while, but it seems the pre-bid requests have increased dramatically.  Here are the issues I identified for my firm when we had to try to come up with a policy:

    1.  Check your state's licensing board.  They may not have any policy regarding this issue, but I found out that our state expressed a desire that stamps not be released electronically unless there is a way to guarantee that they cannot be modified or copied (which there is not, no matter how much software manufacturers crow their security).  We ended up with a secondary stamp to replace the original for electronic publication.

    2.  Understand that once a document is published electronically, no one will be able to control where it goes or who sees the document.  Internet security specialists tell us to teach or children that once something is published to the internet it will live there forever.  The same is true once drawings or specifications are sent out electronically.  There is no way to control where the CD or email will be sent next.  Normally, this may not be an issue.  However, there may be some exceptions, like the next issue.

    3.  You shall get permission from the Owner prior to publication.  And I did say, "shall" and not "should".  Do not open yourselves up to the anger of an Owner by thinking you may or may not need to ask them.  If your Owner is a bakery in strip mail, they probably won't care if the drawings are published.  And indeed there are some Owners that will require that they be published electronically.  However, if your Owner is a bank or other security-regulated industry, they may not be willing to let these documents get published.  I have had healthcare clients who did not want drawings published electronically after 9/11.

    4.  Get a consensus among your licensed professionals.  They are ultimately responsible (liable) for the drawings that they signed.  They will need to come to a consensus about publication of their stamp or not.

    5.  You cannot charge for the drawings themselves without implying a warranty.

    6.  You can charge for handling (preparation and creation) and shipping of the drawings, but you should have some statement that accompanies the electronic drawings and specs that state that the charges do not imply a warranty but are for shipping and handling of the documents.

    7.  You should include a disclaimer stating that the drawings are not warrantied or guaranteed and that the only legally binding documents are the ones signed by the professional.  This will prevent someone from believing that they can use the documents without verifying field conditions.

    If you have any questions, or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me.


    -------------------------------------------
    Kent Steen Assoc. AIA
    Associate, Architectural Designer
    Davis Design
    Lincoln NE
    -------------------------------------------


  • 5.  RE:Distribution of Documents Electronically

    Posted 09-15-2010 03:02 PM
    The first thing to check is your state's practice law.  Does it allow for electronic distribution?  How are the electronic files to be stamped and signed?  The practice law could be different for engineers, landscape architects, and other professionals, so you need to check with each consultant.  Our tactic is to distribute only non-editable pdf files, and only in accordance with Texas law.  Your professional liability insurer may also have an opinion on this matter.  When we distribute contract documents electronically, we post the drawings to our own web site.

    The advantages include:
    1. Much lower distribution costs for us and for the owner
    2. Subcontractors can download the sheets they need and review any and all other sheets for information relevant to their trade.  They can do this any time of day or night without having to coordinate access with a plan room.
    3. All contract documents - plans, specifications, addendum, RFIs, etc. - can be maintained in one place for the duration of the project.
    4. Anybody with a computer can download, view, and print a pdf.
    5. Access control can be maintained in cases where the project is limited to invited or negotiated bids by judicious use of log-in names and passwords to the web site.

    Of course, the above procedure does not address the situation where you need to share editable drawings or building models.  We occasionally provide background drawings to certain subcontractors to facilitate their shop drawing process, but only when they are willing to pay a preparation fee and sign a release form.  We have not yet had a request for a building information model and have no procedure for doing so.

    Hope this helps.

    -------------------------------------------
    David Schele AIA
    Project Architect
    Austin TX
    -------------------------------------------








  • 6.  RE:Distribution of Documents Electronically

    Posted 09-16-2010 06:52 AM
    Along the same lines, has anyone had requests to provide BIM (Revit) Models for use by the contractor during the construction phase on a traditional Design Bid Build project, and if so, how are you managing this?

    -------------------------------------------
    Phil Steinberg AIA
    Principal
    Braun & Steidl Architects Inc.
    Akron OH
    -------------------------------------------








  • 7.  RE:Distribution of Documents Electronically

    Posted 09-16-2010 11:47 PM

    we use AutoCAD and ArchiCAD, because REVIT doesn´t work with us, and I´m a ArchiCAD pro-instructor, usually some of our specialist (contractors) want a model or "real" drawings.....if they´re the same people we work all the time is no matter to share BIM models, or a complete set of drawings, because we´re confident they´re not going to misuse of our work.

    On the other hand if they are newbie's for us, they must work with pdf onscreen info. That's because here in Chile, there is no such thing like state boards or strict laws against misuse of plans or project info..........

    That's the reason why we (most of the time) work with the same contractor and they know how we work, that's good because they ask much more less than a newbie and we have less complication and better results. From time to time this is most expensive (not so much), or a little cheaper for our clients but we always get a good result, the best possible with the assigned resources.

    As an example you can see my profile on architizer (http://www.architizer.com/en_us/people/profile/rodrigo_godoy/) and take a look on McVey Addition and Las Palmas House, both projects start with simple hand sketches and drawings respectively, then in the middle of execution we (my partner and I) made technical drawings and models........that's because the guy who build this houses, works more than 14 years with me.....and he knows two important things, 1st what we want, and 2nd how we want things to be build.

    Maybe this are the most important things.................and the budget!!..............and the time!!!!!!!!!!!!



    -------------------------------------------
    Rodrigo Godoy Alcarraz

    Architect Principal

    Landskron & Godoy Architects
    Santiago, Chile


    -------------------------------------------



  • 8.  RE:Distribution of Documents Electronically

    Posted 09-16-2010 11:53 PM
    maybe you (all) can take a look on VBE (Virtual Building Explorer) of Graphisoft.... this could be a reasonable and secure form(way) tho "share" a BIM with contractors.....

     

    -------------------------------------------
    Rodrigo Godoy Alcarraz

    Architect Principal

    Landskron & Godoy Architects
    Santiago, Chile


    -------------------------------------------



  • 9.  RE:Distribution of Documents Electronically

    Posted 09-20-2010 07:36 AM


    -------------------------------------------
    George Tracy AIA, NCARB, LEED AP
    Senior Associate
    Hermes Architects, Inc.
    Houston TX
    -------------------------------------------