Committee on Design

 View Only
  • 1.  pupose and value

    Posted 02-09-2015 04:18 PM



    Client Value and High Performance Design

    The debate over how to gain respect, status and market share for architects is seemingly endless and perhaps not surprising since the profession represents a very diverse constituency in size and focus of practice.

    The notion that respect, status and market share can be gained by legislatively enhanced practice acts (based on our role as protectors of life safety) seems less productive than a focus on broader value that can be provided regardless of the nature of a practice.

    From my perspective practices that focus on purpose providing value which resonates with clients regularly achieve respect, status and market share. The following is an example of what I mean by a practice's purpose which drives client value. It comes from my definition of High Performance Design (any design which meets a high percentage of this criteria).

    Purpose and Value in Architecture

    1. Awakens and inspires the human spirit
    2. Transforms the user enterprise to a higher level of performance
    3. Makes the place /object better, including its context
    4. Accomplished with minimal essential , sustainable resources
    5. Affordable to user, enterprise and society

     

    Awakens and inspires human spirit

    This is probably what most of us as designers are most attuned to, and is the focal point of most of the professions' design awards programs. It is about shaping intellectual and emotional response to an environment or object through manipulation of all the tools of form (i.e. light, color, materiality, shape, formal reference etc.)

    The value it provides to clients ranges from personal inspiration and pride to iconic status and brand identity, and from being very ephemeral to being very quantifiable.

     

    Transforms the user enterprise to a higher level of performance

    This is often the principal value sought by institutional and corporate clients who in creating a building are making one of their largest commitments of capital. It is about shaping an environment that enhances the activity which the environment is intended to house, through manipulation of spaces, order and form to optimize such things as serendipitous interaction, appropriate light, sound and contrast, systems of movement and sense of well-being or belonging.

    The value this provides to clients ranges from improved productivity or creativity, reduced product time to market, increased customer satisfaction, reduced staff turnover, and even the ultimate Wall Street goal enhanced stock price.

    Most institutions and industries have (before and after) metrics to quantify these kind of benefits. Astute designers can help their clients utilize the design process itself as a tool in making cultural shifts within their enterprise to achieve these benefits.

     

    Makes the place/object better including its context

    This should be a prerequisite for any environmental intervention and is a benefit sought by most (though not all) clients. It is about recognition of the value in the attributes of the place (and its variety of stakeholders) and designing a change which, on balance, improves the sense of place through adding a needed emphasis, complementing an existing fabric, bridging an urban gap, adding clarity, humor, light, etc.

    The value this provide to clients may be somewhat indirect through providing value to community. Some clients may see this as beneficial to their enterprise, others not so much. Done well it is likely to enhance real estate value, but often for the community more than the project. Quantifying the benefit is difficult because it tends to be very long term.

     

    Accomplished with the minimal essential, sustainable resources

    This is an important area of value delivery that seems under recognized in delivery of built architecture. While the "green" aspects of this (sustainable materials, energy and water conservation) receive a reasonable amount of attention and resonate with a significant client base, the broader aspects of resource minimalism such as elimination of design/construction waste through integrated design, parametric optimization and simplification, materials optimization etc. are under recognized. In an industry where estimates of waste are well in excess of 30%, this is a critical arena for value delivery, and would likely resonate with a broad range of clients.

     

    Affordable to user, enterprise and society

    The value to be delivered here is a very important one to all clients. If they cannot afford the design solution proposed, no matter how magnificent it is a failure for them. Or if society cannot afford the environmental cost of the solution it is also a failure. But the success value is in finding that creative solution which solves the client's intent within their means, which in most cases may be straight forward, but in many may include finding new ways for clients to accomplish their goals which allow matching their programs to affordability.

    This can be the real magic of design and provide extraordinary value. Architects who can consistently do this are delivering value resonating with most clients.

    -------------------------------------------
    James Jonassen FAIA
    Seattle WA
    -------------------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: pupose and value

    Posted 02-10-2015 05:47 PM
    Excellent outline James thank you.

    -------------------------------------------
    Michael Malinowski AIA
    AIACC President Elect
    Applied Architecture, Inc.
    Sacramento CA
    -------------------------------------------




  • 3.  RE: pupose and value

    Posted 02-16-2015 03:09 PM
    re:  Purpose and Value in Architecture

    The comments are clearly stated, and are wonderful objectives, but how to achieve them is not always clear.  As someone who has taught in business schools, I am very aware of the capabilities of even business undergraduates relative to problem solving and decision-making.  Indeed, the management disciplines continue to advance, and as architects, we need at least to be familiar with their emerging concepts and tools, and ideally be able to use them in our own decision-making.   

    Matters concerning building design are almost always difficult, and dealing with the more profound design attributes that give purpose and value to architecture are even more challenging.  Almost always when dealing with sustainability or historic buildings, one is attempting to balance monetary costs against non-pecuniary benefits.  Yet there are tools (and cautions) that can assist in dealing with such issues.

    Architects often seem resistant to learning the methods increasingly numbers of our clients are using.  At an architectural conference presentation a few years ago, one attendee proclaimed "architects don't make decisions", and it was met with nodding heads among the audience.  Accepting defeat is not the answer.  Of course, architects do make decisions, and have to recognize it and increase their skills.  Otherwise, the ability to make those very decisions that can enhance the value of buildings will slip further away - presumably to be picked up by those business school graduates.  

    This area has been one concern of my organization, and we have undertaken funded research in the area for the past fifteen years, often working in conjunction with major property-owning organizations - as well as architects.  We have been working through both long-established and emerging management concepts, and applying them to land- and building-based decisions.  There are very real complications when undertaking such work - in the world faced by architects, quantified information is often difficult to obtain, and typically incomplete, suspect, and in need of substantial interpretation.  Fortunately, there are ways of overcoming these sorts of issues.  

    We are concerned about defending the decision-making role of architects, and, based on our research, have created a couple of books about decision-making for architects:  New Generation Whole-Life Costing:  Property and construction decision-making under uncertainty (2006) Ian Ellingham & William Fawcett, Taylor & Francis, and more recently, one applying management insights into how to deal realistically with matters of sustainability: Whole Life Sustainability (2013) Ian Ellingham & William Fawcett,  RIBA Publishing.

    -------------------------------------------
    Ian Ellingham, PhD, FRAIC
    Cambridge Architectural Research Limited
    -------------------------------------------