-------------------------------------------
Catherine Schwabe AIA
Cathy Schwabe Architecture
Oakland CA
-------------------------------------------
David Ludwig's posting prompts me respond to one of his comments - " I have been reading the AIA news and blogs for months, and there has been a lot of discussion about the economy, but few suggestions regarding constructive and effective action." His posting comes on the heels of an email from the AIACC last week in which the accomplishments for this year were listed. Nothing on that list addressed the the economy and its impact on our profession in any kind of substantive manner.
I was on a flight this week from Philadelphia to San Francisco and while conversing with my seatmate - a grad student in the Philadelphia area - our conversation turned at one point to her kitchen remodel. I always enjoy these kinds of exchanges in large part because I am curious about whether folks are using an architect or not. If they are not, I spend more time discussing their ideas and if it is clear that the conversation has given them new ideas I usually conclude the discussion with the suggestion that they contact their local AIA chapter and get a recommendation of two or three architects who specialize in residential work.
This conversation went a little differently - because at some point she told me that she was being careful to not alter any plumbing or electrical in her current kitchen because if she could avoid doing that she would not need a permit.
And -- if she did not need a permit -- she would not need to hire an architect. I stopped her to ask her to clarify what she had just said - was I correct in understanding that construction work in PA requiring a permit always required an architect? She confirmed that this was true.
There was a posting some time back from an architect - possibly also in PA - who aluded to this same point. He was quite busy still because of this state law. I read that at the time and was surprised - as this is not at all the case in California.
So, in my mind - this seems like a perfect "constructive" task which could be addressed at both the state and national AIA levels. In spite of housing starts being down (and this too might well be addressed by the national AIA to lobby Congress and the President to address the lending resistance on the part of the banking industry) if all permitted work, in all 50 states required an architects stamp -- not only would we get far less junk ( the posting regarding the starchitects contribution to the 9th ward aside) but there would be much more work for architects. And - "the end of architecture" would be far.
Original Message:
Sent: 12-10-2010 14:51
From: David Ludwig
Subject: Allowing my AIA membership to expire
This message has been cross posted to the following Discussion Forums: Committee on Design and Residential Knowledge Community .
-------------------------------------------
I am allowing my AIA membership to expire. I am a sole practitioner specializing in remodel and new home construction. I have been practicing since 1971 and been a AIA member for most of those years. I have completed 194 projects, and did design-build for 17 years, personally constructing 65 projects. In 2008 I averaged 100 billable hours per month. Last month I billed 19 hours. In 2008 there were 200,000 residential building permits issued in California. In 2010, there were 40,000. I have been reading the AIA news and blogs for months, and there has been a lot discussion regarding the economy, but few suggestions regarding constructive and effective action. I have also read about the "end of architecture" as a profession. Here in Marin County, California, I am experiencing a culture of fear and a willingness to create mediocrity in the built environment. This seems like "the end of architecture" for me.
As a 66 year old residential specialist focusing on traditional arts-and-crafts and lodge design, my AIA membership has not really provided me with much tangible support. All of the publications and awards focus on contemporary design. I am a journeyman carpenter and was a general contractor for 17 years. This experience has provided me with the most valuable knowledge I have acquired during my long career, including my 7 years at CAL, and it has allowed me to taylor my practice toward collaborative and successful relationships with my builders. I do a significant amount of design on site during the construction phase.
When reviewing the daily offerings for continuing education, there is never a mention of on-site learning as a source fore continuing education credit. Since I do not experience on-line education as valuable to me, I have not found real classes that are available to, or of interest to me. My "continuing education" occurs every day in the real wold of my practice, rather than in a classroom setting. I began my work and secured my "continuing education" long before it became recognized and/or required as a part of my AIA membership.
So I'm letting my AIA membership expire. I live in a solar-powered Airstream trailer home/office, and I've started collecting my social security to survive. There are no longer funds for memberships and classes that do not directly contribute to my economic survival. I wish the rest of you all the best in your own personal dealings with the economy. I'll see you on the road.
-------------------------------------------
David Ludwig AIA
David Ludwig Design
San Anselmo CA
-------------------------------------------