Walter
You are absolutely right (and nicely put, too)! I have been thinking along the same lines for some time now, and agree completely that if we are to survive and contribute as a profession we must have a base from which our value springs, and opinion, or 'art' simply is not enough. Note that I did not say that they are not important, but rather that they are not enough.
I know that is hard to accept, but 'art' in particular simply does not carry the significance in the general populous that it does within the architectural community. We need to be able to argue for a design solution based on knowledge. This is not an urban design issue, but a general design issue. If we can say "Because of X, Y and Z research, this solution provides blah, blah results and therefore should be adopted", we are much more likely to survive the trivialization (or through value engineering, the 'optimization') of architectural design.
Knowledge Communities like this one are the places for the general membership to begin to affect that. Practice and Academia need to work together to identify the issues and opportunities for strengthening our knowledge base and delivering it to the practice for implementation. A knowledge based profession is not to be feared, but embraced. It does not preclude art, but rather gives it the solid foundation on which to stand.
I look forward to (hopefully) hearing from the rest of the profession. I'm hopeful this will incite a thoughtful as well as passionate discussion about HOW we move forward. The who MUST be us.
Thanks for your post - a very nice start to the day.
-------------------------------------------
Edward Shriver AIA
Principal
Strada Architecture, LLC
Pittsburgh PA
-------------------------------------------