Regional and Urban Design Committee

 View Only
  • 1.  Why Pedestrian Safety Remains Elusive

    Posted 08-08-2014 07:18 PM
    This message has been cross posted to the following Discussion Forums: Committee on the Environment and Regional and Urban Design Committee .
    -------------------------------------------

    Friday, August 8, 2014

    Why US Pedestrian Safety Remains Elusive

    Even though overall traffic fatalities continue to fall, pedestrian deaths not only stayed stubbornly high, they even increased in some areas. How come?
    Pedestrian fatalities rose from 13% to 17% in
    the US in the last nine years
    The first guess may be technology. While improved vehicle safety protects the life of the driver and passenger better and better, those outside the vehicle, primarily bicyclists and pedestrians, are left out.  Even worse, the bigger, faster, and quieter that cars and SUVs have become, the more they have mutated into effective killing machines for those who are in their way. The safer the roads are made for driving (curves, straightened, sightlines improved, trees felled etc.) the more drivers are lulled into a false sense of security and the faster cars can safely go - both possibly to the detriment of the pedestrian.  

    That the pedestrian carnage isn't an immutable price one has to pay for technological progress becomes obvious if one realizes that there are significant differences in pedestrian safety between different countries and states, ....
    Read full article


    -------------------------------------------
    Klaus Philipsen FAIA
    Archplan Inc. Philipsen Architects
    Baltimore MD
    -------------------------------------------
    AIA26 San Diego June 10-13


  • 2.  RE: Why Pedestrian Safety Remains Elusive

    Posted 08-12-2014 07:36 PM
    As (radical) students we used to cry "the streets belong to the people" which became more of a lament than a promise of activism. Since then I have become an active dog walker in the evening. And ever more frustrated by the system. My neighborhood may be less urban than what Klaus envisions as we have neither sidewalks nor street lights, but cars and trucks and pedestrians nevertheless.. In this configuration, all walkers take to the street and assume as much right in doing, as the vehicles. But walkers do so at a great risk that drivers do not face. It is truly harrowing at times, and so dog walking has become about the most dangerous thing I do now since giving up bar fighting.

    All that Klaus says about the causes and reasons for so many pedestrian deaths are probably true.

    My own conclusion is that drivers have no understanding of how lethal their machines are on streets and only revel in the roar of their fuel injection addictions. How little respect for pedestrians there is in this world of driving machines is my current lament. People take on a different attitude about themselves "behind the wheel" and it shows in lack of respect in other ways too. I drive interstate long distance regularly and see countless carcasses of animals, still there, or what's left of them, the next time through. That we haven't figured out a way to simply and respectfully remove the meat from the street is woeful and our society's shame. I'm sick to my stomach from it and the promotion of speed, power and vehicular supremacy is on the wrong side of history. Not to be too moralistic or anything, you may feel inadequate at times but getting into your leather seat with 300 or more turbo charged HP - well that's performance enhancement and security and no one has the right to interfere or obstruct especially a pedestrian or a dog who can't anyway. Not. 

    As far as I am concerned, pedestrians have the right of way. I slow down or stop for all, as well as for animals. That is impractical. But that's part of the solution, a consequence of our frenzy for vehicular rights of way. That is, if in fact, we still value life as it is.  
    -------------------------------------------
    Allen E Neyman
    Rockville, MD
    -------------------------------------------


    AIA26 San Diego June 10-13


  • 3.  RE: Why Pedestrian Safety Remains Elusive

    Posted 08-12-2014 08:37 PM

    Allen,

    Cars weigh 1.5 to 2.5 tons; trucks more, and are made of steel.  People weigh 50 to 250 pounds (with a few notable exceptions), and are flesh and bone.  People are typically walking at speeds up to 3 miles per hour - only a few running.  Cars are travelling from 20 to 50 mph. in varying urban conditions (when they bother to observe speed limits).  Pedestrians - especially very old and very young ones - make bad decisions.  Drivers make bad decisions - especially the very old and very adolescent. That is all there really is to know; no matter the decision made, pedestrians do not run over cars and kill or maim them.  The answer is really straightforward, but the tendency for planners is to accept the urban model of  pedestrians and vehicles interacting in the same space as an inviolable norm to be somehow favorably ameliorated - a palliative response, at best.  The only truly workable solution: separate people from cars as nearly absolutely as possible.  Any city that cannot accomplish this separation remains seriously deficient in vastly important ways that over-exploit human adaptability. 


    -------------------------------------------
    Gary Collins AIA
    Principal
    Gary R. Collins, AIA
    Jacksonville OR
    -------------------------------------------


    AIA26 San Diego June 10-13


  • 4.  RE: Why Pedestrian Safety Remains Elusive

    Posted 08-13-2014 06:50 PM
    Gary

    Separate, segregate, sure. In my corner of reality, practically speaking, segregating vehicles from pedestrians will require resources that will never be justified by need. But there are things that could be done. For example, certain streets could be labelled "pedestrian priority", or "bicycle priority", and "vehicular" priority. A requisite  change in behaviour would be attached to the classification. For example, the pedestrian priority streets could have a slower vehicular speed limit, and thus discourage traffic and tame it. Other streets could be bike friendly, and provide broader bike lanes, and so forth. 

    That is not say that on any street, vehicles, bikes or pedestrians have to be prohibited. Unrealistic because no one wants that. Only that they are viewed differently and practically adjusted more or less to be viable for each type of traffic. Consider minimally disruptive adjustments to perception that alter the way we are required to look at and use the street, leading to solutions that do not require "massive infrastructure redevelopment" that we tend to think of as the only solutions. It means also that all streets are not the same. . The reorganizing or prioritizing our streets is about adopting "passwords", posting street signs for cars and people, and probably pavement markings, to permanently alter the way they are perceived and ultimately used.      

    Allen E Neyman
    Rockville, MD
    -------------------------------------------


    AIA26 San Diego June 10-13


  • 5.  RE: Why Pedestrian Safety Remains Elusive

    Posted 08-13-2014 09:53 PM
    Allen,

    Resources justified by need?  No one wants that? You underscore my point that allegiance to the "standard" urban model dominates the discussion.  It's hard to see the skyline for the buildings, I guess.  We tend to accept the fundamentals of what we are used to, and believe that we can settle for "tweaking" it to minimize the carnage - asking the species to adapt rather than revolutionizing the environment.  The noxious qualities of cars aside, no matter how many signs are erected, nothing will keep the occasional drunk, visually or hearing handicapped elder or  energetic 5 year old from stepping into traffic.  The automobile is not designed to live with people in short distance transit conditions - ordinary city streets. 
     
    I didn't say that "vehicles" need to be segregated.  Golf carts and people get along fairly well, actually, and a lot more of them fit into the shared space. Furthermore, urban streets and other spaces can be designed for people far more successfully when they are free of massive vehicles capable of speeds well in excess of that dictated by their numbers and rate of flow in heavy traffic.  Cars are inefficient, unsustainable, and the way they are used, silly.  Trucks and public transit factored out of the discussion, the average private vehicle weighs a couple of tons.  Its single occupant averages maybe 170 lbs.  The ratio is .04:1.  All that size, expense, fuel, danger, and environmental impact to lug around one human being doing little more than going to and from work, or running an errand. Silly.
     
    When the infrastructure is inhumane, inefficient, dangerous, and overextended, its massive overhaul is exactly what we need.  Rather than thinking of such an approach as exploring an economic and practical impossibility, think of it as developing "product" with untold economic potential and long-term human benefit. 
     

    -------------------------------------------
    Gary Collins AIA
    Principal
    Gary R. Collins, AIA
    Jacksonville OR
    -------------------------------------------


    AIA26 San Diego June 10-13