Committee on Design

 View Only
  • 1.  Restrooms Are Damaging People's Lives

    Posted 06-07-2011 02:35 PM
    This message has been cross posted to the following Discussion Forums: Center for Value of Design and Committee on Design .
    -------------------------------------------


    -------------------------------------------
    Bruce Pitts
    A&E HVAC Mechanical Engineering
    self
    Aiken SC
    -------------------------------------------

    Approximately 7% of the population are unable to urinate in the presence of others.  This condition is known as paruresis.*  In buildings designed with multi person restrooms, paruresis sufferers are unable to urinate when others are in the same room or can hear this.  Toilet/urinal partitions or background music often provide little or no relief.  This environment damages the quality of life people should expect when functioning in society. 

     

    Private restrooms eliminate circulation square footage (the square footage in multi person restrooms for public movement within the space) and thus can cost about the same or less to build as multi person styles.  Private restroom doors typically open onto a corridor without need for this circulation square footage.  

    Design private restrooms with the minimum amount of space.  Even ones that are accessible only require wheelchair access into the room, wheelchair rotation and access to the sink.  A minimum 8' long by 5' wide could suffice for either accessible or standard private restrooms. 

    Walk into any multi person restroom and count up the number of fixtures and figure this 8' X 5' private restroom for each fixture.  Compare this to the size of the multi person restroom with all of its circulation square footage.  For large multi person restrooms, square footage savings can be as high as 50% by designing private restrooms instead.  

    Cluster private restrooms along a main corridor wall with self closing doors to maintain the aesthetic integrity of the space. Specify 1) visual occupied/unoccupied door locks allowing people to see which restrooms are available; 2) flush tanks instead of flush valves that can provide sound as needed; 3) an exhaust fan in each room operated by a wall switch (when possible in low rise buildings) that provide sound as needed. 

    Architects, like many people may be unwilling to discuss this topic.  Is an architect going to discuss with coworkers not to design multi person restrooms due to around 17 million Americans not being able to urinate in them?

    Yet, for people suffering with paruresis, the buildings architects continue to design are useless.  This can affect a person's ability to keep a job, go to a restaurant, movie, mall, etc. This may be the cause for agoraphobia for many and look at the cost to society.  Continuing to design multi person restrooms is a major mistake.  Design private restrooms only.

    Private restrooms can make the building foot print smaller meaning costing less to build with fewer property taxes for the owner and less ventilation though out the life cycle of the building.  Also, consider the advantages to society designing buildings that increase productivity and enjoyment while attracting people to the work environment and to the market place.  These are qualities that architects should bring to society anyway.**

    Seven percent of Americans is the population of New York State.  Paruresis is extremely common.  Now that you understand why, design private restrooms in all future projects.

    *      www.paruresis.org and 

    ** The American's With Disabilities Act (ADA) Section 302. PROHIBITION OF  DISCRIMINATION BY PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS:  "(a) General Rule.--No individual shall be discriminated against on the basis of disability in the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations of any place of public accommodation by any person who owns, leases (or leases to), or operates a place of public accommodation."  ADA also states that a person is "considered to have a disability if he or she has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities."



  • 2.  RE:Restrooms Are Damaging People's Lives

    Posted 06-08-2011 09:12 AM
    There are a few design issues that would need to be considered.  Yes, a 5 ft by 8 ft restroom would be able to fit a common single user restroom, and the square footage might even get smaller.  However, much more corridor wall length would be taken by these restrooms.  Also, how would you handle the requirements for urinals in some use groups?  Urinals speed up the turnover time in restrooms significantly, but if they were in a restroom with a toilet and sink, they would not be available all the time.  Even though the square footage might get smaller, you would have a higher cost per square foot for these areas since adding stud and gypsum board partitions in lieu of toilet compartment partitions would be more costly (as well as adding that many doors, frames and corresponding hardware).  You also might be increasing your number of fixtures since often fewer sinks are required than toilets, but in a single user restroom there would need to be a sink in each restroom.  There is also issue of families with multiple children.  It is not uncommon to have a mother in a restroom with two or three children in stalls.  I would not want my child exiting into a public corridor in some buildings.

    Bottom line, design the usual restrooms and add one or two single user restrooms.  This is commonly done in malls and churches already and labeled as a "family restroom."  Or, perhaps, you could design the accessible stall as an enclosed room complete with acoustic insulation and full door.

    -------------------------------------------
    Bridgett Wakefield AIA
    Gorski Reifsteck Architects, Inc.
    Champaign IL
    -------------------------------------------








  • 3.  RE:Restrooms Are Damaging People's Lives

    Posted 06-08-2011 03:03 PM


    -------------------------------------------
    Bruce Pitts
    A&E HVAC Mechanical Engineering
    self
    Aiken SC
    -------------------------------------------
    Bridget, your concerns are ones I have considered as well.  Yet, if up to 50% less square footage is required for private restrooms as compared to larger multi person styles, additional walls, sinks and door openings are absorbed by this square footage savings.  On smaller floor plans, there is typically a square footage savings as well that helps toward paying for these items.  Urinals would become obsolete as would toilet partitions.  In men's restrooms, specify spring lifting toilet seats if need be. 

    I disagree with the need for more corridor space as generally plenty of corridor wall space exists in a typical building design anyway.  If it is an open cubicle floor plan, then stack the private restrooms back to back behind an elevator shaft with a plumbing chase going down the middle.  For families with children, make some of the private restrooms slightly larger if necessary. 

    A faster turn around time with urinals is questionable.

    By adding one or two private restrooms only, though, these become the most popular restrooms in the building.  I've worked in a building like that and waited at times for the restroom to become available.  Besides, this required walking  going down three floors to get to the one and only private men's restroom.  This is an unproductive architectural design.

    I appreciate your taking the time to address this issue.  Hopefully, other architects will take notice as well.