The AIA Code of Ethics has a rule that actually covers this issue:
Rule 4.201 Members shall not make misleading, deceptive or false statements or claims about their professional qualifications, experience, or performance and shall accurately state the scope and nature of their responsibilities in connection with work for which they are claiming credit.
Commentary: This rule is meant to prevent Members from claiming or implying credit for work which they did not do, misleading others, and denying other participants in a project their proper share of credit.
If Architect A is an AIA member I would point out to them their need to correct this misinformation and, if no response, you have an ethical duty to report this violation.
-------------------------------------------
Alice Schuler AIA
architect
Kuklinski+Rappe Architects
Chicago IL
-------------------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 12-17-2013 17:53
From: Steven Hackbarth
Subject: Authorship Claims for Competitions
I'd like to hear opinions about the ethics of the following situation.
Architect "A" is a partner at "Architectural Firm 1" with Architect "B". "Architectural Firm 1" designs a house that is constructed in 2006. Architects "A", "B", and Architect "C", not a partner, all worked closely on the design. Architect "C" is the project architect responsible for the construction documents. Architects "A", "B" and "C" are all responsible for construction observation.
In 2008 Architect "A" leaves "Architectural Firm 1" and starts "Architectural Firm 2".
Just wondering what the forums opinion of Architect "A's" submission of that project created while at "Architectural Firm 1" claiming sole authorship by "Architectural Firm 2" for a competition entry in 2013.
Thanks for your help!
-------------------------------------------
Steven Hackbarth AIA
Architect
Clinton Corners NY
-------------------------------------------